"A couple" is exactly 2, excepting very specific downward exaggeration ("I'll only have a couple of beers.")
"Several" is always more than 2 but always a small number - say 3, 4, or 5.
"A few" is always more than 2 and probably more than several.
"Many" would normally exceed several, probably by quite a bit.
And of course "one" is always 1, excepting downwards exaggeration similar to a couple.
I do consider that "a couple" is imprecise and varies by context. Asking for a couple cloves of garlic while cooking could mean 2-4, especially if they are small. Asking for a couple bulbs of garlic on a shopping list could only mean 2!
For items, I think I'm also more like to shift into "half a dozen" or "dozen" than expect common ground on what "several" communicates. For days, I think I'd shift to "a week" or "N weeks" as soon as it spans a Monday-Friday work week, even if the start/end weeks are partial.
Context: in HoMM, a turn-based strategy game, you can see wandering "armies" in the world map, but cannot see the exact number of units in these armies unless you spent some points in scouting. What you do have is a verbal description of the army ("several trolls", "lots of faeries", etc.).
Those words always seemed the most fantastical to me
I would say that "a couple" can also mean several. For example:
"Come back in a couple of days and we might have them in stock".
"Turn right where the old farmhouse used to be and they are a couple of k's down the road"
I'd allow that "a couple" could mean "2 that I'm certain about, but possibly 3 or maybe even 4".
I have to say I never thought there'd be that much disagreement among English speakers around the world on such basic terminology.
And what quantity is "quite a bit"?
Few and many also depend on context. "So few people voted last election" could mean 20,000,000 people, whereas "Many supreme court justices believe..." could refer to only four people.
It wasn't until 17 that someone (my girlfriend at the time) pointed out that by definition it should always be 2.
I'm not sure why I thought there was some fuzz in there. I also don't know why nobody had corrected me until then. I can only speculate that I and the people around me usually said "two" when we wanted two of something. The rest of the time I suppose I had a 50/50 shot at the right answer.
Ultimately we probably should just avoid using these words when asking someone to do something that will result in some sort of concrete number of things or events. Better to just convey a specific number and avoid confusion.
* "a couple of things" _ is a general statement meaning, sundry articles
* "a couple of specific things" _ sundry but specific articles which the knight errant must not fail to fetch, e.g. dinner likely depends on it
* "a couple of apples" _ means two apples
As an American myself, it felt like one should know how precisely how many filet mignons one wanted when ordering in a restaurant, rather than leaving it up to interpretation.
Didn’t realize then that “couple” in British English was almost certain to mean exactly two. I wonder if Americans also used it in that sense back in the 1970s when that episode was filmed, or if that is actually a bit of a shibboleth goof — the “American” actor was of course British, like everyone on the show except John Cleese’s real-life wife Connie Booth.
(Now that I think of it, as Booth was a co-writer, she probably would have caught this mistake if it was in fact a difference in American vs. British English. I imagine instead the American meaning has drifted toward less specificity over time.)
“I only had a couple of beers, officer.”
“Hey, can I borrow a couple bucks?”
That's a distinct meaning from "couple" as in "couple of apples", where it really does just mean "two".
People like playing with language, and use understatement regularly. Unlike “I’ll just have two beers”, where it’s obvious to any child who has learned to count that this is the case, when kids regularly see people around them say “I’ll just have a couple of beers”, they assume couple is another word for an indeterminate small amount like few. When they later learn of other uses of “couple” they assume these are unrelated.
Sometimes one may want to be accurate but not really need to be precise. Sometimes one needs to be both accurate and precise. One should never be precise and inaccurate (e.g pi=8.739216503).
But sometimes people need to be vague and ambiguous (e.g diplomacy) and sometimes one can be ambiguous with another who knows exactly what he means.
Sometimes the gap is easier filled with non-verbals. If a waiter asks me if I'd like fresh ground pepper on my salad he doesn't ask if I want one twist, a couple of twist, few twist, or several twist. He starts grinding the pepper over my salad and says "Say when".
On the other hand, my wife has no need to ask. She knows I mean sex. (You didn't see that coming. I jest, but a couple has several ways of saying sex without saying it, some fewer than others.)
Years ago I read ‘The Difference Engine’, a steampunk novel written by an American set in Victorian England. I thought the dialogue etc seemed quite realistically English until one of the protagonists returns from a bar with ‘a pair of pints’. No Brit would ever use ‘pair’ like this although ‘couple’ would work, sort of.
I'd bet that most people have this kind of relative meaning for these words
I agree; five is right out.
Watching a Mad Men clip last night, Draper, Sterling and a client are at a restaurant and Roger handwavingly dismisses the waiter saying "bring us a couple of iceberg wedges" for, presumably, the three of them, and I thought "Who exactly did he order for?"
Couple = 2, that's it. Few = 3 75.000001% of the time. Otherwise it's 4.
* single = one
* couple = two
* few = three or four
* many = five or more
Both single and couple seem very well cemented to me, people say "he's single" or "they're a couple", and there is no confusion there.
But few and many were hammered into my head with equal certainty.
eg. i just need to you to grab a couple of things from supermarket for me.
The number of items is small, not not always two.
US citizen, parents from two different dialectal regions in the US.
I was corrected as a child for using "couple" to mean an indeterminate small number and instructed that it means precisely two.
Sounds like she’s into polygamy? ;)
I was in the US and someone corrected me when I said I had a couple of something and they said "Actually, you've got three" or something "That's what I said" "You said a couple" "..."
It had never occurred to me that people mistakenly thought couple meant exactly 2 - how weird.