7
points
E-Reverance
Joined 407 karma
- How was he equally brutal
- I haven't tried this myself and this might be absurd, but attending PhD defences might be an interesting way to meet new people
- It should be noted that this is NOT the official scores on the private evaluation set
- I didn't know how to title this. I definitely don't believe his proof claims but I found this whole event to be psychologically interesting
- 2 points
- One can care about both
- 1 point
- > I do actually believe that zero teenagers should make banking apps or run non-profits.
That sounds like a lot of fun and should be a pretty social experience.
Also I'm going to assume his parents are proud, which should put his family at ease.
- 5 points
- Surprised there wasn't any mention of Equilibrium Matching [1] in the future work section
- 2 points
- 2 points
- 2 points
- Just for reference, the main author's stance on god : https://youtu.be/k_VBzweMIlM?t=125
- 1 point
- The article has a hyperlink on it : "Bushart shared an image[1] of President Donald Trump with the quote"
- I don't take issue with the name itself, but more so having a whole figure and paragraph dedicated to it in what is supposed to be a technical paper.
- >Figure 18: The Taiji-DDN exhibits a surprising similarity to the ancient Chinese philosophy of Taiji. Records of Taiji can be traced back to the I Ching (Book of Changes) from the late 9th century BC, often described by the quote on the left (a) that explains the universe’s generation and transformation. This description coincidentally also summarizes the generation process and the transformations in the generative space of Taiji-DDN. Moreover, the diagram (b) from the book Tom (2013) bears a closely resemblance to the tree structure of DDN’s latent fig. 1b. Therefore, we have named the DDN with K = 2 as Taiji-DDN.
Very nitpicky comment, but I personally find such things to make for a bad impression. To be more specific, branching structures are a fairly universal idea, so the choice of relating it ancient proverbs instead of something much mundane raises an eyebrow.
- >The similarities are abstract: both use iteration to concentrate probability mass, both employ external oracles, both amplify marked states through operations on the full state space.
Pardon my reading comprehension, but I don't understand the analogy with Grover's beyond just reweighing probabilities
- 4 points
- 3 points
- 2 points
- 3 points
- Never mind, you were right that it is edge detection (a terrible one though lol):
https://shaderacademy.com/shaders/glsl/ranked_1/fragmentExpe...
But I still stand by the ai-gen'd aspect
- Click on where it says DIFF; its not edge detection
More likely to be some kind of color space thresholding
- The expected output to the quiz does not seem like something someone would intentionally choose
- I don't think they made most of the quizzes either (see link in my other reply)
- Ex. of unvetted output : https://shaderacademy.com/challenge/ranked_1
not to refute the difference in extent but this is somewhat notable https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dahyan_airstrike