Preferences

Well, yes, but you don't have to work.

hippari2
More like you are not allowed to work. Loss of work experience, loss network, not even accounting for inflation.
bigiain
I would welcome an opportunity to walk away from the entire tech industry with a guaranteed-for-life income, allowing me to pursue dreams without them needing to be financially viable. Setting up as a high end timber boat builder without ever needing to turn a profit while still having the same income I do now is something I'd jump at immediately.
davkan
While I agree with the sentiment, you could lose that income at any time should they close to drop to non compete.
jaggederest
Plus, nobody says you can't work in any other field you like, just not whatever you used to do.

Net present value of 50% of salary for the next 30 years is something like a million dollars for most HN commenters, I'd guess.

bruce511
Except it's not "for life". It's until they feel free to lift the non-compete. My guess is that most information you take from a company is irrelevant in a couple years. Maybe 5 tops?

Plus it'd almost certainly end with zero notice. You'd get a email saying "you're free to go". Suddenly. After say 26 months.

So it's not like a "pension for life" - just a gap in your employment history.

jaggederest
Oh no, ah jeez, slightly more than one year of income for zero effort, darn.

Any employment gap can be easily explained by saying "I was under a non-compete and being paid garden leave while working on personal projects to keep my skills fresh". It's very common in e.g. the finance world, I believe.

sagarm
And loss of negotiating power -- the company knows your BATNA is garden leave, and probably not a better offer.
ghaff
For a lot of people, taking 50% of base salary (absent bonus/RSU/etc.) isn't very practical. Even if there's some alternative like Starbucks.
kragen
Doesn't mean you don't have to make the mortgage payment.

This item has no comments currently.