schmichael parent
Oregon at least makes it 50% IIRC. Anything less than 100% seems useless though. Usually when taking a new job in the same industry you expect a pay bump, so even a 100% rate is likely leaving money on the table.
Well, yes, but you don't have to work.
More like you are not allowed to work. Loss of work experience, loss network, not even accounting for inflation.
I would welcome an opportunity to walk away from the entire tech industry with a guaranteed-for-life income, allowing me to pursue dreams without them needing to be financially viable. Setting up as a high end timber boat builder without ever needing to turn a profit while still having the same income I do now is something I'd jump at immediately.
While I agree with the sentiment, you could lose that income at any time should they close to drop to non compete.
Plus, nobody says you can't work in any other field you like, just not whatever you used to do.
Net present value of 50% of salary for the next 30 years is something like a million dollars for most HN commenters, I'd guess.
Except it's not "for life". It's until they feel free to lift the non-compete. My guess is that most information you take from a company is irrelevant in a couple years. Maybe 5 tops?
Plus it'd almost certainly end with zero notice. You'd get a email saying "you're free to go". Suddenly. After say 26 months.
So it's not like a "pension for life" - just a gap in your employment history.
For a lot of people, taking 50% of base salary (absent bonus/RSU/etc.) isn't very practical. Even if there's some alternative like Starbucks.
it's not necessarily about fully compensating you. It's about making the non-competes actually cost the company something so they can't use them as free leverage to get you to accept shitty conditions today because quitting means not being able to work in your field at all for x years even if someone wants you around.