Preferences

For a long time I've been trying to make a DIY milligram-accurate scale, and milligram-accurate strain load cells are expensive. Does anyone know if the resolution of this is high enough?

My dad built one with an electromagnetic coil many years ago, can't find the design, capacity was limited but had 100? microgram resolution, maybe similar to this applied science video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ta7nlkI5K5g but I think simpler.

maybe something like this: https://www.erowid.org/archive/rhodium/chemistry/equipment/s... https://www.erowid.org/archive/rhodium/chemistry/equipment/s...

I found some old emails about the scale from 2005/6 but can't find the link and it would probably be gone anyways.

Thanks for the reference! If you do find the link maybe it will be in the WABAC machine.
That's the most interesting misspelling of "wayback" I've seen so far.
You can just buy strain gauges which are specially cut copper foils on a thin plastic substrate that you glue to something, like a metal strip. The resistance changes very slightly as the metal bends.

You measure the change in resistance with a wheatstone bridge tuned correctly.

You basically just need a strain gague (a few dollars), 4 resistors, an op-amp, and a microcontroller with an ADC.

Calibration is important and you'll run into things like the metal bar creeping, permanently bending as a result of weight being put on and off.

But also, milligram accurate scales are $20 on Amazon https://www.amazon.com/GRAM-PRES-Precision-Milligram-Reloadi...

Not every scale with milligram repeatability has milligram accuracy, and not every scale with milligram resolution readouts has milligram repeatability. You probably know that, but not everyone reading this does.

(This one might be fine? It does claim to have a 50.000g calibration weight, which is a good sign, but it doesn't say anything about metrological traceability, which is a bad sign.)

Precision and accuracy is very expensive there is a reason why high end measurement equipment costs as much as it does.
At some level it becomes expensive, but it's far from clear that five significant figures of mass is that level.

A US$2 quartz watch measures time to 5½ significant figures, US$10 multimeters routinely measure voltage to 4½, and US$5 GPS receivers can provide you with time measurements accurate to 40ns that inherit the drift of world metrology standards, a precision of 16 significant figures if you are measuring a long enough time interval (over 10 years).

As a quick and dirty rule of thumb measuring parts per million in anything except time or frequency will get expensive. Temperature drifts will cause expansions and contractions on that order if you’re measuring lengths.
Yes, but in this case we're measuring weights, not lengths, and we're looking for 5 sig figs, not 6.
Where are you finding $10 4.5 digit multimeters?
>metrological traceability

It's a $20 scale, if you had need of metrology you wouldn't be buying a $20 scale. Most of us do not need metrology. I want to make small amounts of pickles with perhaps unreasonably precise measurements of salt at scales where half a gram or maybe a tenth of a gram is significant.

You said, "Milligram accurate scales are $20 on Amazon," and linked to that scale. I'm questioning whether it's really accurate to a milligram. It sounds like now you're questioning that, too. That's fine. But please don't pull this sour grapes bait and switch bullshit.
My uninformed opinion based on no experience is that this will creep so you should use a Kibble balance instead. (See sibling comment by s0rce.) Or maybe use a lever arm to amplify milligrams into tens of milligrams of force. Or just a regular pan balance. How big a weight do you want milligram precision on?

If you have some way to cut a precise shape out of some kind of metal sheet of well-controlled thickness, could you cut out a milligram precision bismar balance or steelyard?

Probably not, PCBs are also terrible as load cells because fibers break.

In general if you want a precise and accurate strain gauge you’ll be paying a lot for it, especially for one that doesn’t need to be recalibrated before every use and after nearly every measurement.

In the video, the author tries it with a small component that I think is a SOT-323-5 or similar. Based on [1], that weighs about 5-8 mg.

[1] https://www.mccsemi.com/pdf/ComponentWeightInformation.pdf

Shahriar has a video on repairing a milligram resolution scale: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lz9mBc6FGzE

They don't tend to use strain gauges I think.

Use vibration to measure small masses. Measuring natural frequency can be very accurate and sensitive.
Milligram accuracy isn’t a really a direct property of the load cell. A lot of it comes down to creep and hysteresis behavior.

This item has no comments currently.

Keyboard Shortcuts

Story Lists

j
Next story
k
Previous story
Shift+j
Last story
Shift+k
First story
o Enter
Go to story URL
c
Go to comments
u
Go to author

Navigation

Shift+t
Go to top stories
Shift+n
Go to new stories
Shift+b
Go to best stories
Shift+a
Go to Ask HN
Shift+s
Go to Show HN

Miscellaneous

?
Show this modal