Preferences

> “Reduce competition” by making online dating exclusive to those who can afford $100+/mo

Suppose you wouldn't need to pay more than $100 if you'd find your match and leave platform. Serious goal = serious price. Marriage will cost much more anyway. Marriage with a wrong person will cost 10x again.


One can buy flowers, pay a cute kid to surprise a lady with them and point at you for a 100 bucks irl, and there's still enough for a drink or two. Hell, 100 bucks is enough for 1 more & refined attempt.
For homo sapiens women make the mating decisions. Unless she immediately judges you as a good genetic fit, she will feel you're stalking her and call the police or something. (Yes, it's mostly genetics. Women have a gut feel for genetic fitness in mates.)
Yes they do, but

- having fun,

- needs,

- desire to gratify received interest,

- desire to return the favor of raising ones attractiveness,

- desire to reward a diverse range of behaviors (some hard-coded into genes as well!)

CAN & often will override anything "fitness", and much more often than not, not only temporary!

If this is what it all boils down to then we should just skip all the bullshit and go straight to DNA sequencing and checking for autosomal recessive diseases and the possibility of genetic diseases for a given DNA pair.
sounds like Elisabeth Holmes pivot strategy but she didn't get to ^^
You are like me, go all in one choice and then suffer when it doesn't work. Apparently strategic people go for quantity and try thousands of people in which case a site is much cheaper:)
Then she says "Sorry I have a boyfriend" lol. Dating sites are useful for reasons...
15 years together, 2 kids, $0 on marriage (Canada has laws for that. After 1 year living together, it's equivalent)
15 years together, 2 kids together and you’ve never bought anything together or planned shared costs? What?
I was referring to the wedding
> $0 on marriage

I didn't mean literally pay to marry. Let's just say your kids and associated expenses is included in what I meant. Do the math:)

I see. Well of course, but supposedly as long as you are buying stuff together, you are enjoying the marriage. The cost comes in case of divorce
So you value such enjoyment at more than 109$ then evidently the price is acceptable:)
I don't value dating the same as marriage though.
If your end goal is serious marriage then $109 is insignificant change if it gets you there.
> Suppose you wouldn't need to pay more than $100 if you'd find your match and leave platform. Serious goal = serious price.

Go read the site and tell me again you still believe they have the “serious goal” of finding you a partner. The first thing I saw on the homepage was “experience hypergamy”. Then a bunch of entries on luxury, spending money, and how everyone on their website is somehow beautiful, successful, and intelligent. All the while using the same two actors for everything. In one of the fake exchanges, one of them (presumably the man, judging from the rest of the copy) invites the other to the Maldives, who immediately agrees.

They’re selling bargain bin fantasies. It’s drivel for men and women who think of themselves as the protagonists of 50 Shades type books.

This item has no comments currently.