Don’t most websites require you to accept cookies?
I know a lot of people who reflexively reject all cookies, and the internet indeed does keep working for them.
- ads are personalized (aka more relevant/powerful to make you want things).
- The experience can become slower when accepting all cookies due to the overhead generated by extensive tracking
In essence, there should be no relevant reason for users to accept cookies. Even accepting and rejecting should be equally easy. The only problem is that companies clearly prioritize pushing users to accept cookies because the cookies are valuable to them.
I can’t think of a technical reason a website without auth needs cookies to function.
Edit: Found lower in thread: biometric privacy laws
Just a guess, maybe it's the VideoFrame API? It was the only video-related feature I could find that Chrome and Safari have and FF doesn't.
Are there laws stricter than in California or EU in those places?
I selected each shoe as individual objects and the model was able to segment them even as they overlapped.