saintkaye parent
The pub was failing and the CEO took an innovation risk that in its near outcome changes the economics of a dying business. He should be admired not fired.
>He should be admired not fired.
That depends entirely upon one's definition of "admirable". Personally, if the act requires one to be deceitful (eg, lying about the fact that your writers aren't writers), then that's not very admirable at all to me. If that's what you find admirable, well... alrighty then.
I'd agree IF he didn't pretend the AI written articles were actually written by humans with fabricated biographies.
If you think making a profit is the one and only thing that deserves admiration, sure. I'm certain you're smart enough to see the flaws in that viewpoint.
nobody wants "innovation risks" when it comes to truth and ethics in journalism.
He broke the trust of his readers and his board.