> The innovation here isn't about reusability at all, it's about the economics of reuse.
It's about both.
SpaceX showed that the 1st stage of a rocket can be reliably reused in production. Which is really important from an architecture perspective because 2/3 stage rockets are just more efficient than 1/1.5 stage rockets (mostly due to the propellant mass fraction term of the rocket equation).
To give some examples, the payload mass fraction of some reusable rockets is:
It's about both.
SpaceX showed that the 1st stage of a rocket can be reliably reused in production. Which is really important from an architecture perspective because 2/3 stage rockets are just more efficient than 1/1.5 stage rockets (mostly due to the propellant mass fraction term of the rocket equation).
To give some examples, the payload mass fraction of some reusable rockets is:
* Shuttle(partial reuse): 1%
* Falcon 9(partial reuse): 4%
* Starship(full reuse, in development): 2%