- water9Perls decline was due to poor syntax and the fact that it was a stream processing language at its core
- The parent doesn’t have to get the kid a phone you know
- Why do you think the kid felt like he couldn’t talk to his parents and had to turn to a computer instead?
- The kid felt more comfortable talking to a computer than his own family
- It makes no sense to spend more money to mint the actual money, then the money is worth OK. You might not like it, but something has to be done because to continue in a slow and methodical process 1) forgets that the government is the same entity that runs the DMV 2) people love to throw out criticisms of solutions that aren’t perfect not realizing that it’s still better than the status quo. To do nothing is costing money or in the case of Ukraine it’s costing lives. 3) I bet you $100 You don’t like Trump.
- When will they create a $200 bill or bring back the 500? I feel like the 50s is the new 20.
- No, otherwise Sam Altman wouldn’t have had a outburst about revenue. They know that they have this amazing system, but they haven’t quite figured out how to monetize it yet.
- They really like to blow sunshine up your ass don’t they? I have to do the same type of stuff. It’s like have to assure that I’m a big boy and I can handle mature content like programming in C
- I found ChatGPT-5 to be really pedantic in some of it arguments. Often times it’s introductory sentence and thesis sentence would even contradict.
- Yeah, because nobody can take personal responsibility from them themselves anymore. And everybody turns to big government to save them.
- Well, it’s much easier to blame ChatGPT than bad parenting
- Yeah, and they’re also not doing rocket science
- Do you know what correlation versus causation is? How do you know that ozone holes don’t appear naturally? But let’s say we did cause it, then you acknowledge that humans also have the capability to fix it when we realize there’s a big enough problem. So the climate apocalypse scaremongering is never going to be a scenario anybody’s ever gonna have to deal with.
It’s either we can fix the problem or we cant. If we can’t fix the problem, then no solution that we’re doing now makes any sense. If we can fix this problem, again, no solution that we’re doing now. Makes any sense because the technology of tomorrow will be much better adapted when the problem gets worse enough to warrant spending $93 trillion a non-probable existential crisis that also conveniently can’t be disproven either. I feel like too many people don’t see that the average person is willing to steal cheat and lie to get ahead.
- OK, but you use very little amounts of the refrigerant. 1 pound of refrigerant that’s in a closed loop is the same as 1 ton of CO2, which is about the equivalent of burning one tree over 20 year period and that’s assuming it leaks out which it’s not supposed to.
- Global warming / climate change
People vastly overestimate science’s ability to predict the future, especially when they often can’t get the weather right, right now.
But it’s more than that. People who study the climate change don’t get funding if there’s no problem for them to study. Their job necessitates there being a problem. It’s a conflict of interest.
- Yes, because if you get a leak in your air conditioner, instead of just patching the hole and refilling it with coolant, you have to replace your entire system in places like California because they require a more green, less gas, in the name of science, and still completely ignoring the simple fact that it doesn’t make a damn difference because we all live in the same globe.
The amount of waste that is generated is 1000 times that of just refilling the coolant. When will people realize that you can use an existential threat that you can’t prove to justify anything? What could be more important than our existence?
If the same scientist came out with a study that said if you don’t pay me $1 million by tomorrow, we are gonna get hit by an asteroid. Would you believe them and pay me? Or has this become a political issue we’re no longer thinking rationally
- It’s a air-conditioning system. It’s dead simple you could learn it in an afternoon watching YouTube videos.
- It makes no sense because people do not acquire information at the exact same time, nor do they act on it with the same amount of force, i.e., capital.
It’s the same stupid people who say the market is a random walk. Oh yeah, if it was a random walk, then why do earnings reports even matter? Companies could just lose and gain whatever they want, and stocks would just fluctuate randomly.
Here’s the truth. It’s called Rice’s theory of opportunity. It says that there is a golden window on the order of a few weeks to a few months where the signal-to-noise ratio has the least attenuation. This is because it avoids the initial transitory periods, the real-time gap between the knowledge existing and the knowledge spreading to people with enough resources to make a difference.
- The global economy was never a bike