- 2 points
- 1 point
- Thank you, all the best to you too.
- That´s the whole point, you see!
You are not surprised at all, even though you know for certain the company it is already doing it everywhere. So we should assume that this is normal? Isn´t this concerning?
This is unacceptable for me, I will not pretend that is all right, and I am doing something about it.
- You are entitled to your opinion and me to my facts.
If the point of discussion here is to downvote me, there you are correct (cause the post I submit keep getting points but my karma goes down, hah funny).
Maybe I am in the wrong place, and so are all the lawsuits that claim otherwise.
- Well as you may see this was not just an idea but was implemented before chatgpt. https://www.reddit.com/r/LLMDevs/comments/1ou8rvp/comment/no...
And this is not the first time as mentioned. Absurd is you if you think that the chats don't get logged and filtered for certain purposes.
How do you think they report to Law enforcement certain crimes??? Keep your attitude for you please.
- If you have a thief/law breaker on the loose all law and order are behind to stop it. If it harmed an amateur or professional is irrelevant.
What is relevant is this:
That is even more concerning, means that every gov employee should apply same logic, but as we know it is not. Factually speaking, whatever info exists in internet, has been scrapped and used for different purposes, violating the law in plain sight. Therefore we should assume that will happen the same with whatever becomes digital data in the future, and we know how all is towards digitalization (example the currency banks, the social security banks, the IRS etc). Furthermore, how difficult will be to reverse engineer an app to get the source code and get around it with intelligent ways (avoiding patent, design protection). It takes a whole life for a human to reach eureka moment but 1 sec for AI to steal and use it. We need better solutions, because when AI takes live in robot machines, it may be late. I have a possible solution (among others) which is guaranteed to work, (AI sensors which will cause pain for every wrong action, same like we have when put the hand on fire), In my opinion, need to be implemented asap as a standard globally.
- Sarcastic behavior detected :)
- 19 points
- Ask ChatGPT that, It will stay thinking for hours, not being able to answer.
Try it yourself... If that is a llm issue in general why this small model gets it right first shot? (check link).
- 1 point
- Testing all the GGUF versions of Qwen3 VL from 2B-32B : https://hugston.com/uploads/llm_models/mmproj-Qwen3-VL-2B-In... and https://hugston.com/uploads/llm_models/Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct-...
in HugstonOne Enterprise Edition 1.0.8 (Available here: https://hugston.com/uploads/software/HugstonOne%20Enterprise...
Now they work quite good.
We noticed that every version has a bug:
1- They do not process the AI Images
2 They do not process the Modified Images.
It is quite amazing that now it is possible to run amazing the latest advanced models but, we have however established by throughout testing that the older versions are to a better accuracy and can process AI generated or modified images.
It must be specific version to work well with VL models. We will keep updated the website with all the versions that work error free.
Big thanks to especially Qwen, team and all the teams that contributed to open source/weights for their amazing work (they never stop 24/7, and Ggerganov: https://huggingface.co/ggml-org and all the hardworking team behind llama.cpp.
Also big thanks to Huggingface.co team for their incredible contribution.
Lastly Thank you to the Hugston Team that never gave up and made all this possible.
Enjoy
PS: we are on the way to a bug free error Qwen3 80B GGUF
- 1 point
- 2 points
- OpenAi managed to keep Microsoft as major shareholder. Looking at the speed of growth Nvidia and friends are growing, OpenAI is 1 click far to IPO and one more click to 10x after IPO then finally buy Nvidia when GPU market cools down.
Just sayin...
- Maybe you are right, on ignoring a study weaknesses and red flags is bad scientific practice. Is that I have been involved personally so long in this topic, that I know for a fact that the results are Good. As I also know many good studies being ridiculed and buried on purpose. No one in the scientific community would dare to criticize a paper in that way. Constructive criticism is connected to intellectual, educated minds, all the rest deserves the same coin or being ignored. I still don´t understand why that comment on top, (I have seen this to many times).
- This was meant for Gwerbret (but he deleted the comment). Now is to whom may concern :) Standing by your words you think this paper is shady and you are questioning the work and results behind it. Moreover your comment somehow is on the very top it misleading the users or at least ridiculing the paper. Answering to you: It is indeed very much connected to the LEVELS of Vit D not the absence of it. You fail to understand and acknowledge the importance of the results (even though you already know and confirm the benefits of Vit D). Regulating the levels of it (keeping them higher then average) it prevents health issues by regulating many biological functions/pathways, raising the immunity and lifespan in general. This is the real cure which prevent incredibly terrible future health issues and suffering.
Edit: Just for this effort, this paper deserves Credit. Bravo.
- Great job, Thank you.
We support your work and offer backup and distribution. Here a copy just in case: https://hugston.com/uploads/llm_models/EuroLLM-22B-Instruct-...
Available at, https://github.com/Mainframework/Quanta or https://hugston.com/uploads/software/Quanta-1.0.0-setup-x64.... (the newer version).
If you like our work you may consider to share it and star it in Github.
Enjoy