Preferences

tjoff
Joined 8,911 karma

  1. I just want to be able to backup my playlists. Maybe thats possible but last time I looked I could only find sites that wanted your login, not gonna happen.
  2. Reddit would be even worse if the translations were better, now you don't have to waste much time because it hits you right in the face. Never ever translate something without asking about it first.

    When I search for something in my native tongue it is almost always because I want the perspective of people living in my country having experience with X. Now the results are riddled with reddit posts that are from all over the world with crappy translation instead.

  3. Users have no options because... everything has been centralized. So it doesn't matter if users care or not.

    Users are never a consideration today anyway.

  4. I'm with you. But the worst case isn't a hobby. The worst case is if you burn out and at the same time loose all appetite for both your work and your hobbies at the same time.
  5. Yes, but the problem is that people often choose a hobby that will benefit their career.

    If you are going to spend time on a hobby why not pick a hobby that also benefits your career? Win win?

    I struggle with that, partly because computer science was my hobby. Then I went to university studying it, and enjoying it as a hobby. Then I started working, still enjoying it as a hobby.

    And if I have 10 interesting topics I want to explore on my free time. Why not pick one that will also benefit my work?

    After all, I don't have as much time for my hobbies nowadays. So picking one that also benefits and influences my work is more fun and meaningful and also allows me to be paid doing something I would have done for free anyway.

    This article highlights the problem with that approach.

    Feels like it is very common in our industry. A very high percentage of "Show HN" fits dangerously close to that. Which is not necessarily a bad thing, it is just exposing yourself to the risks mentioned in the post.

  6. Because IMAP is horrible, it is another driving reason why we are moving towards the dystopian world of webmail.
  7. Webapps limited by 4GiB memory?

    Sounds about right. Guess 512 GiB menory is the minimum to read email nowadays.

  8. You cache the revocation list, no? If it is in the list it is revoked...

    How do you know it is allowed again? Because it responds with a new certificate, that isn't revoked...

    You are not leaking anything. You are just downloading a list of revoked domains. Regardless of whether you are visiting them or not.

  9. You could of course cache the list, only download whatever was new from a specific date. Short-lived certs would vastly reduce the list as well.

    Not really sure how big of a problem a list could be?

  10. Yeah, didn't see it mentioned, I trust it will still be available?
  11. Took me a really long time to realize that I should scroll. Because why would I? There is absolutely no indication that there is anything to scroll to.

    I clicked on the two avatars but that didn't get me very far and the only thing left to click was "by alvin chang" but that was about as fruitful as I imagined it would be.

    So I assumed it was a podcast, re-checking that I had audio on etc. But nope, so I checked another browser. Same there... Then I read HN comments, ah ... Great design? ...

  12. It isn't and won't be. So no.
  13. ... which is much less of a problem for Linux than closed source ecosystems.
  14. Neither has Microsoft, Google nor Apple.
  15. Yes, and that was exactly my point in my original post...

    With or without, neither is going to be perfect. At least when not even attempting eye-tracking. But there are still many reasons to do it.

  16. Sure they do, the moving object in focus will not have motion blur but the surroundings will. Motion blur is not indiscriminately adding blur everywhere.
  17. It adds realism.

    Your vision have motion blur. Staring at your screen at fixed distance and no movement is highly unrealistic and allows you to see crisp 4k images no matter the content. This results in a cartoonish experience because it mimics nothing in real life.

    Now you do have the normal problem that the designers of the game/movie can't know for sure what part of the image you are focusing on (my pet peeve with 3D movies) since that affects where and how you would perceive the blur.

    Also have the problem of overuse or using it to mask other issues, or just as an artistic choice.

    But it makes total sense to invest in a high refresh display with quick pixel transitions to reduce blur, and then selectively add motion blur back artificially.

    Turning it off is akin to cranking up the brightness to 400% because otherwise you can't make out details in the dark parts off the game ... thats the point.

    But if you prefer it off then go ahead, games are meant to be enjoyed!

  18. WSL 1 works fine. I much prefer it over 2 because I only run windows in a VM and nested virtualization support isn't all there.

    Also feels a lot less intrusive for light terminal work.

  19. Zero cost is an antifeature.

    It is just centralizing the web. You can do a lot with a $4 droplet if a single board computer isn't your cup of tea. Not "buying" into icloud/cloudfare is alone worth that cost. Also much more meaningful stack to learn.

    Nothing against the post/author, I just feel the creativity to "exploit" features of the giants that is put in place just to undermine alternatives is misplaced.

  20. ... but support for existing things get increasingly pushed onto support teams.

    And support teams don't fix bugs?

  21. As a privacy conscious user I'm surprised you consider anything other than firefox. Is is not confusing.
  22. You are talking about incremental compilation?
  23. With realtime results?
  24. Writing in the browser, seriously?
  25. Which is the point. RAII is very much not only used for memory nor construction.

    Not saying it is a good term, but we are stuck with it and trying to change it to a better one will only make it worse.

  26. If you know the font in advance (which you often do in these cases) you can do insane reconstructions. Also keep in mind that it doesn't have to be a perfect match, with the help of the color and other facts (such as likely location) about the car you can narrow it down significantly.
  27. But you demonstrately did not make it easy or simple.

    Of course there are tons of alternatives even if you are behind CGNAT. Nebula is but one.

  28. Then why go with tailscale in the first place?

    There is slacks nebula and other options that are completely self-hosted from the start.

    Feels like such a weird hype around tailscale.

  29. That is table stakes. So, rewind 5 years. Introduce that, remove attestation while you are at it. And make sure we have multiple compatible implementations.

    Without it passkeys are a sham. And since that was and is the case I don't see any conceivable future where passkeys benefit anyone but google/apple/ms. For the sake of the web it needs to die.

  30. It doesn't have the killer feature of passkeys though, vendor lock-in. Which is the sole purpose of them.

This user hasn’t submitted anything.

Keyboard Shortcuts

Story Lists

j
Next story
k
Previous story
Shift+j
Last story
Shift+k
First story
o Enter
Go to story URL
c
Go to comments
u
Go to author

Navigation

Shift+t
Go to top stories
Shift+n
Go to new stories
Shift+b
Go to best stories
Shift+a
Go to Ask HN
Shift+s
Go to Show HN

Miscellaneous

?
Show this modal