timdiggerm
Joined 761 karma
- timdiggerm parentBut can he speak Italian lawn games?
- For that to be relevant to this post, they would need to write with secretary hand.
- I look forward, should this prove correct, to the explainers from Quanta, Numberphile, etc.
- The edginess was, at the core of it, what made them fun in the first place
- You're right, you just can't make memories without injecting ink into your skin.
- Right, which tells us that what was fun about it was feeling cool for doing something unusual.
- > Progress in AI is happening faster than ever before
Is it happening faster than it was six months ago? a year ago?
- Yeah, and definitely not AITok
- That's interesting, but how many people are actually going to just scroll and watch these (thereby generating ad revenue)?
- If it's ad-supported or I'm seeking donations, I only want people reading it on my website. Why would I want people to access it through an LLM?
- His notes, of course, were assembled by his producers, based on the notes & writing of those academics (and others, I'm sure, thus the weekly reading list). He sometimes made reference to this, saying things like "Well you said it in your notes; what did you mean?"
- A nontrivial plot point in Kim Stanley Robinson's "Green Mars" (1993)
- There are still paleontologists [who?](I do not know; I'm sorry) who would like to substantially credit the Deccan Traps; this appears to be adding stronger analysis to the evidence that it really was the meteor impact.
- Degrowth and "Maybe this uses too much electricity" are not the same thing, particularly when a nontrivial portion of US generation is fossil-fuel based.
As for the breakthroughs, maybe they will, maybe they won't; it's not much of an argument.
- > I cynically think this was OpenAI’s aim when they made ChatGPT free for students
Is there any interpretation that makes sense _other_ than this?
- Do they not use saws?
- How does it identify what's vague?
- Or we could acknowledge that something could be a bad idea, despite its utility
- You may have missed that Idiocracy is a pro-eugenics film, in which the populace got stupider by way of being fecund. It's not about this problem, really.
- You're right that last time there were "adults in the room" trying to keep him in check.
This time, however, he's often doing whatever Heritage/Project 2025 tell him to do. Russell Vought, Stephen Miller, John McEntee, etc.
- Surely, since "silent disco" only really works if everyone is dancing to the same music (which is the only thing that would make sense for a post about synchronizing audio), they're using "source" to mean "device"
- They don't have a functional physical product
- His overall point, that it happened later, after different technological innovations, and required government regulation is correct though
- > Of course, this image is only possible because of our vantage point. Astronomers in other galaxies wouldn't catch such a wondrous image.
Well no, but they probably would catch other wondrous images we can't catch due to our vantage point.
- Would you believe that humans turn on traditional web-crawlers as well?
- Yeah, this plus the apparent lack-of-planning regarding lenses & field of view make me wonder if OP had any of the background they should have had in stop-motion animation?
- Were we ever doing that though?
- This interpretation is covered in the essay.
- Why do you want to do that?