- 43 points
- Interesting points about enforcement.
But I think the real barrier to adoption is that most people don't mind using centralized systems. If their Visa card works when they swipe it, they don't think beyond that. If it's easier for the end user when systems are centralized, breaking people out of this mindset will be very difficult.
- LogMeIn | Designer - New Product Innovation | Boston | ONSITE I work at LogMeIn, and while we are now a huge SaaS company my team is focused on operating independently to build an awesome new product.
We are a super small team of engineers, product, and data nerds. We all wear lots of hats depending on the day but we are looking for a great designer to join us to lead all things visual. You will be responsible for creating prototypes, high fidelity designs, interviewing users, designing and performing other types of research, brand management and more.
Since we are part of a larger company we can offer full benefits, awesome new offices in Seaport, and competitive salaries. Shoot me an email if you want to find out more - calum.barnes@logmein.com
- 2 points
- 1 point
- 3 points
- This seems awfully shortsighted. Perhaps some 'home' devices are gratuitous at this point but certainly there are other uses for headless devices to be connected to the internet.
Yes, the only thing that benefits from a an internet connection is a computer, but eventually everything will need to have a computer in it.
- 1 point
- This is ultimately my same issue with Handy. I don't want a different person every single time. I think this makes it really hard to make it work.
That being said I have had Handy come and clean many times now and not changed it, so I think there is a slight convenience factor. It would be better if Handy just facilitated the direct communication with the same person to come every time. And instead of charging me a fee, charged the cleaner a kind of 'management' fee. I think that would better.
- Interesting that you went it alone. I bought mine on mass drop and it cost me around $275 when all was said and done. I did get the full hand with metal tops though.
I think you saved a good deal of money by having access to a laser cuter, which makes me think that the mass drop price is actually not terrible given the extra convenience of everything arriving as a kit.
The blue acrylic top is awesome!
Have you considered tents to tilt the edges? They made a huge comfort difference for me.
- The AllJoyn [1] protocol supports local communication between devices. It gives devices of certain types the ability to tie into defined APIs for specific shareable functions. So that your door lock could turn on your lights for example.
Not saying this is a perfect and open system, but it could be a step in the right direction and does not require a live internet connection for your things ot talk to each other.
AllJoyn has a lot of major backers but has yet to take off.
- Reminds me of the villains boat in Tomorrow Never Dies [1]
1: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/06/19/article-2005464-0C...
- Curl is my go to tool for this sort of interaction. I have been a long time Postman user though. The number one feature it has which curl doesn't is collections. Which is basically their name for saving queries. I have my companies entire API saved in various collections which allows me to quickly do any API call without looking at documentation or having to whip up so JSON boilerplate.
For more advanced or one off testing, curl would still be my go to.
- Why not just add it to the base price of the Uber ride? Still seems a little gimmicky to me.
I take uberX a very short distance on almost a daily basis. $1 more represents a 12% or 15% price increase in each of my rides. I thought the cheap short rides, was one of the best features of UberX. This will make me consider continuing to use them for these short daily trips.
- You've made some interesting choices here. Lots of people here are questioning using a gateway, but I think this is a great choice for what you are doing, and required to get decent battery life. However, I think using ZigBee will end up pricing you our of most markets in the long run. Especially if you elected to go with the very pricing Xbee modules from Digi. These are developer friendly, but way to expensive. If you are serious about building this as a product, I would investigate alternative RF solutions, there a lot of good ones out there.
Check out the 6lowpan standard, which is specifically designed for this kind of communication. Dust Networks (http://www.linear.com/products/smartmesh_ip) has a good implementation. The other alternative would be to go with some of the proprietary RF standards, I know this sounds prohibitive at first but will end up saving you money on your BoM in the long run. Check out Atmel's LightWeight Mesh (http://www.atmel.com/tools/lightweight_mesh.aspx) which is based on 802.15.4, the same as Zigbee and BT, so if you want you can even run ZigBee on the same hardware. Linx also makes a great proprietary RF module (https://www.linxtechnologies.com/en/home) which is extremely cheap even at low quantities.
If you are using Xbee (which it seems like you are) then you are likely not using a SoC, so designing in a different radio may still be relatively easy.
PM me if you have any questions, I've been working on this IoT stuff for a while now. Congrats on the crowd funding campaign and best of luck.
NYC Mesh pays for it through donations. Last I checked they were trying to setup a 501c3 to manage this, unsure of the status though.