18
points
syspec
Joined 2,963 karma
- syspec parentYes! Completely agree! So hard to debug. Nearly impossible to set breakpoints (they disappear in refresh).
- Sometimes the AI is all too good at writing tests.
I agree with the idea, I do it too, but you need to make sure the test don't just validate the incorrect behavior or that the code is not updated to pass the test in a way that actually "misses the point".
I've had this happen to me on one or two tests every time
- Don't worry, the 99% reduction in battery materials is just a strategic pivot to an 'asset-light' approach. The 4680 supply chain isn't collapsing, it’s just being 'optimized' for a future where cars apparently don't need batteries—just FSD subscriptions and robotaxis that run on optimism.
- I used to do this with Karma test runner. The best part was how it didn't try to capture everything, so debugging with breakpoints was really easy.
I like Vitest browser mode, but it's a pain to just "detach" for a specific frame and run that test in isolation, with my actual breakpoints.
- > This announcement is more than just a headline—it's validation of our pioneering work with General AI Agents.
Anyone else thought this was satire when they read that as the second line in the announcement?
I literally laughed, then clicked the top left logo, to check out the homepage and see if this `ManuAI` was a real website.
---
You would think that they would know better to at least edit that out.
It's not just ironic -- it's cosmically poetic.
- Alls they need to do is make extensions much much easier to build, especially extensions that render HTML.
That's vscode's moat.
Anytime the same extension exist in both vscode and jetbrains, the jetbrains version is clunky, crash, and unstable.
I keep Jetbrains open while using vscode, for its local history/git/etc features, but how long will that be enough to keep my subscription
- 2.5 flash and 2.5 Pro were just sitting back and watching?
The problem with Google is that someone had to show them how to make a product out of the thing, which Open AI did.
Then Anthropic taught them to make a more specific product out of there models
In every aspect, they're just playing catch up, and playing me too.
Models are only part of the solution
- I have "unlimited" access to both Gemini 2.5 Pro and Claude 4.5 Sonnet through work.
From my experience, both are capable and can solve nearly all the same complex programming requests, but time and time again Gemini spits out reams and reams of code so over engineered, that totally works, but I would never want to have to interact with.
When looking at the code, you can't tell why it looks "gross", but then you ask Claude to do the same task in the same repo (I use Cline, it's just a dropdown change) and the code also works, but there's a lot less of it and it has a more "elegant" feeling to it.
I know that isn't easy to capture in benchmarks, but I hope Gemini 3.0 has improved in this regard
- Hmm... it basically says that real power in the US isn’t with the government anymore, but with giant tech companies and the rich weirdos behind them.
These rich weirdos run the show through apps, platforms, and algorithms that decide what people see, do, and believe.
It’s not that democracy broke, it just quietly got replaced by a system where the rules are written by whoever owns the server.
- I think one thing they need to focus on is making extensions easier to create.
I'm a big fan of Intelli-J, but VS Code is eating their lunch with AI agent plugins. I'm assuming it's because it's much easier to create them on that platform.
The same pluginm from the same team, on Intelli-J always works much slower, feels clunkier and is prone to crashing.
It's a shame
- I've been using Open WebUI and have been blown away, it's a better ChatGPT interface than ChatGPT!
https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui
Curious how this compares to that, which has a ton of features and runs great