2
points
selckin
Joined 129 karma
- selckinThis Apple policy is the only thing stopping chrome from having a full monopoly, and we should be careful trying to remove it
- You can view the image here: https://archive.is/IfEFc
- you're describing proprietary software with a full support contract.
the point of free software(tm) is gaining benefit from cooperation and community, and nobody is obligated to do anything.
- In the actions overview, just the spinner icon (svg w/ css animation) takes 25-40% cpu and 10% gpu in my chrome. Enough to keep my fingers very warm on the laptop
- well can't create an instance without having quota available
and low quota is low, like 10 cpu, so start a 2 node k8s cluster with 8cpu each? nope, go request quota increase
- no, they have very low quotas by default, and you have to request increases through the portal, which then get rejected and you click the button to contact support/email and then you sometimes have to negotiate with them
you have to do this for every single instance type they have, can't even experiment or test other instance types cause its too much trouble to get quota
- Or that then gives people the motivation to work on gcc, have to solve the chicken-egg
- "The broader security issue being addressed is Intel SA-00532 that could lead to a denial of service by authenticated users due to insufficient control flow management"
What's an authenticated user in CPU context?
- it's a workaround for a lacking type system