- sailfastLove this. I guess I need to build the happy Gilmore meme audio now. “Welllll?!!! We’re waiting!!”
- Wouldn’t smart TVs that didn’t spy on you also be awesome? Seems like a knowledge gap to me. This gets solved as soon as people realize what’s happening. Right now they don’t realize TVs are cheap because of the ad subsidy.
- Do you have a nice 65” OLED monitor option with solid display settings supporting Dolby modes, etc I can examine? I tried to find one and nobody is selling.
- For now maybe? Consumer protections are at an all time low at the moment. Your exact argument about “we all know this just nobody cares and stop whining” is exactly what will be cited if you attempt to take action if they brick your device.
- That does tell me why Paxton brought this suit. Either that or somebody is trying to blackmail him over something he watched.
- This is an excellent idea.
- While this is certainly possible, I’d imagine this sort of thing would be found quite quickly and would result in a massive lawsuit if not disclosed on the package.
- Pretty sure that’s why this lawsuit will have some legs - the deceptive way folks are opted in without really understanding what is happening.
I’m shocked to be agreeing with Ken Paxton but he’s right on this one.
- How many more bugs does it produce if we use CodeRabbit to review PRs? I assume the number will be less? (Asking seriously and hopefully if the product will help or would’ve caught the bugs, while also pointing out the natural conclusion of the article is to purchase your service :) )
- To quote Hunt for Red October: “This business will get out of control.”
- The one wrinkle this might have is that it incentivizes the agent developer to over-resolve or “over outcome” to ensure they hit targets.
This is risking the end customer experience for your Agent buyer, which might not be worth the risk to a company that wants to keep customers very happy.
- Yeah, I mean how dare you?! I pay good money for high uptime SLAs! :)
- All the major players offer a CLI, for what it’s worth.
You won’t need Vim except to review changes and tweak some things if you feel like it.
- You still need to be curious. I learn a ton by asking questions of the LLMs when I see new things. “Explain this to me - I get X but why did you do Y?”
It’s diamond age and a half - you just need to continue to be curious and perhaps slow your shipping speed sometimes to make sure you budget time for learning as well.
- I think the biggest challenge now becomes how more seasoned engineers teach juniors. The AI makes the ramp a lot easier but you still do best when you understand the whole stack and make mistakes.
It’s damned near impossible to figure out where to spend your time wisely to correct an assumption a human made vs. an AI on a blended pull request. All of the learning that happens during PR review is at risk in this way and I’m not sure where we will get it back yet. (Outside of an AI telling you - which, to be fair, there are some good review bots out there)
- My read: China is seen as a serious geopolitical rival that the United States must beat in a shooting or Cold or AI or <insert here> war. As a result PHDs to China as an export would be a negative impact, not a positive one potentially.
- At least in the United States we are not getting this benefit.
If AI does begin to really crater the job market, only owners of AI (yes including shareholders) will benefit but most folks do not own stock - or at least do not own any significant amount of stock.
- Yeah - that’s kinda what I was thinking. Unless you’re doing quite granular approvals it gets tricky.
- Ah yes - this is the way. Thanks.
- Yes - separate secrets always - but you've still got local or dev secrets. Seems like the above permissions are the right way to go in the end. Thanks.