4
points
potamic
Joined 2,113 karma
- potamicHumans are still needed, but they just got down-skilled.
- Got a source?
- > It is a luxury good that only a very small number of people care about
The world runs on computers. It is as essential as oil for the functioning of societies. Increase in silicon costs is going to increase costs unilaterally across the board. It happened during the pandemic and something similar will happen now. If anything it should be a wake up call to countries to start thinking about securing their own supply chains.
- Would it be as ironic if one wrote an article about Google and used Google search to research their sources?
- One could say the same thing about a higher power as well. But the scientific stance is clear on that one.
- That's not how science works. You have to devise an experiment that can independently validate the assertion.
- It's not good enough for science. How do you approach it so it can be independently verified?
- But is consciousness even a thing? Shouldn't the burden of proof be on the one making a claim that there exists something called consciousness? If they cannot show evidence that such a thing exists or may exist, then for all purposes it does not exist.
- When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
- Are you sure 2 minutes? That's 1000+ tokens/sec.
- What's the token usage and time taken to run this for a given repository?
- 6 year time period between 1990-1996. Would have been interesting to see how these results would have fared across the 2000 crash.
But I don't think the paper claims that they beat the market. What they are concluding is that you can classify investors as skilled and unskilled, with the skilled group able to achieve returns consistently. But whether those returns can beat the market, they say the evidence is limited.
- Well, the last 5 years or so is the epitome of a bull market.
Did the paper say the same set of people consistently beat the market over long periods of time or did it say at any time about 10% of investors happen to beat the market?
- For someone who developed their own quantum processor they're pretty light on technical details. Anyone knowledgeable in this field chime in, if this is indeed the case or is it likely white-labeled from another manufacturer?
- Not a dentist, but my read of the situation is that dentists generally are not very excited about doing fillings and there's a push towards getting into more complex procedures like root canals, invisalign and implants. It's probably partly due to wanting to upskill and increase your repertoire and partly due to the margins. The margins with these procedures can be an order of magnitude more than that of fillings, especially anything that is supplied by a big brand.
- Isn't ART also destructive? Just that it's done with hand instruments instead of a drill
- Do you have any examples/demos for very large codebases? Because it's easy to get decent quality output using LLMs on small codebases. But large, messy codebases is where you really need help with understanding.
- Why would someone do that? Especially for presidency which is the final stage of their career? They're not beholden to or reliant on anyone no more so shouldn't have to be swayed by any adverse interests.
- How did you test this? Did you train something?