outer_web
Joined 411 karma
- > “The Court ultimately determines that the Government’s actions on that day demonstrate a willful disregard for its Order, sufficient for the Court to conclude that probable cause exists to find the Government in criminal contempt,” Boasberg wrote in a 46-page ruling detailing his decision.
The title correctly states that Boasberg found cause to hold the government in criminal contempt. It correctly did not state that Boasberg did not hold the government in civil contempt, yet.
- Political? This is law and crime. It's also relevant to someone, such as yourself, who occasionally comments on civil liberties.
- Say what you will about his funding methods but the wall solved immigration as promised. Never heard about illegal border crossings again after it was built.
- You post something and based on its content you assume someone from an ideological group flagged it. And for that reason you flag and opinion of someone you assume is from that group?
What a way to live.
- Lol in consecutive comments you claim the whistleblower made it up and NPR made it up. Take a break.
- He told Time (POTY interview) that because Congress didn't fund his wall idea and he had to take it from the military, he was going to do everything through executive action.
- I am going to be so much more productive now that I'm incentivized to code everything from scratch.
The administration has been flaunting the fact that judges can't easily police their bad faith actions ("oops, too late", "ms13 is an invading military"). Here Boasberg has found a low threshold for holding the administration accountable.