Preferences

onurcel
Joined 501 karma

  1. great idea! just ordered one, I will give it a try
  2. First of all, great job! I think the inference will become more and more important.

    That being said, I have a question regarding the ease of use. How difficult it is for someone with python/c++ background to get used to zig and (re)write a model to use with zml?

  3. > It started by accident, with the original llama weights being leaked by two separate employees.

    This is not true. Meta Fair has been built on openness from day 1. We published many papers and open-source d many repositories to reproduce the work

  4. On a side note, if you are running something for days or weeks you should implement checkpointing anyways. I have no idea if matlab allows that for internal operations
  5. These CRUD apps need complex business rules, requiring expertise in the domain and making them configurable on the application level for customer while trying to keep the app not bloated.

    Scaling is not the only challenge engineers face, but somehow it's the one that is mostly praised.

  6. same. I have these exact urls bookmarked for years
  7. For popups I blame the website developer, I read these as "let me give you a small annoyance to push a personal opinion" => ctrl+w
  8. To be accurate, IE was not hated by "end-users". It was hated by web developers (understandably) reluctant to support non-standard apis and by informed people.
  9. Realistically, with the title you suggest nobody would have read the post.

    A title is not "the most informative and complete sentence summarizing the article", it also has the goal to stimulate curiosity. I understand that we don't want misleading titles but this obsession on titles is not very helpful. I am participating in this useless conversation but I couldn't help myself. Now every single HN post has a comment on how the title is wrong..

  10. I hope the magic of HN will bring one of the men in the photo to intervene here.
  11. I don't get it. An open-source project don't need users? Sure someone could publish a work for the sole goal of publishing it, but most of the time you make something public for a reason (financial or not). In fact, like the other comment in this thread, I find the author's point contradictory to ask for sponsoring their project. Again someone could sponsor something that has no utility, but it seems to be far fetched to say the open-source don't need users.

    However, while I disagree with the statement, I agree with the sentiment. Most open-source projects' authors don't care about their users, at least not as much as in the beginning, probably because of the said incentive mismatch.

  12. argument by authority?

    He also said pytorch was just a hype. It looks like he just doesn't like things he didn't do himself.

  13. I am curious what makes the author think that expert reviews are free of any incentives for abusing their influence. Also, if you ever built anything useful in your life, you should know that it's not possible to count solely on word-of-mouth, even in a upotian marketing-free world.

    Listen, I get you are disappointed by bad actors, but going to the other extreme is never a solution.

  14. this is actually our recurring joke for our team meeting offsites!
  15. This is one of the examples we keep in mind and that's also why we can't 100% trust public dataset labels. This motivated us to train a Language IDentification system for all the languages we wanted to handle in order to build the monolingual dataset. More details in the paper ;) Or here, if you have questions
  16. hi @btheshoe, I work on this project in the data part. As others mentioned, the amount of data available for a language is not correlated to the number of speakers of that language, which explains the potential impact of focusing on these.
  17. in this work we tried to rely not only on automated evaluation scores but also on human evaluation for exactly this reason: we wanted to have a better understanding of how our model actually performs and how it correlates to automated scores.
  18. This is 100% Google's responsability. If you claim to have a feature but it is broken it's your fault, you should just not claim that you can actually do this. The restaurant guys provide exactly what they want: a pdf menu, if google can't parse it correctly it should show the raw information instead of trying to do something fancy
  19. > Is it only me who’d like a 15 inch air?

    yes

  20. In my opinion Tesla has the largest part of the fault here. You can say "yeah we all know Elon Musk is lying and that is not a real auto-pilot", but I am having hard time to understand why the responsability of a blatantly lying company/CEO is not discussed.

This user hasn’t submitted anything.

Keyboard Shortcuts

Story Lists

j
Next story
k
Previous story
Shift+j
Last story
Shift+k
First story
o Enter
Go to story URL
c
Go to comments
u
Go to author

Navigation

Shift+t
Go to top stories
Shift+n
Go to new stories
Shift+b
Go to best stories
Shift+a
Go to Ask HN
Shift+s
Go to Show HN

Miscellaneous

?
Show this modal