19
points
msoad
Joined 8,467 karma
- msoad parentMy layman view is that more compute (more reasoning) will not solve harder problems. I'm using those models every day and when problem hits a certain complexity it will fail, no matter how much it "reasons"
- I use yek
- 2 points
- I have not tried Bun yet but the long list of features makes me skeptical that it's all solid and bug-free. I'm wishing to be wrong. I'll give it a spin in a future project.
From a project management perspective I'm a little confused why would you spend time on S3 support while you're still not 100% Node.js compatible. Next.js is a very big ecosystem and if you can get Next.js customers onboard you'll grow much more than supporting S3.
- I agree with Tailwind's stance on this. You really don't need @apply if you're breaking things down to smaller components. I often see people have things like <ul><li className="long_list_of_classes">text1</li><li className="long_list_of_classes">text2</li>...</ul>. This is where I think we need a linter to warn against things like that. Make those <li>'s a component!
- Here is a conundrum:
With all that AI generated code being pushed, as a leader I wonder which is better? Enforce a ton of e2e so no code that is really well thought through all aspects of the solution can go past CI or does this enable AI to go even crazier and break all sort of best practices to just pass the test?
- I'm not trying to be cheeky here. They have literally joked about how TypeScript versions means nothing really. So they can't just announce a new major version and drop enums completely. Maybe with a feature flag this is possible but even then, a fresh tsc --init not supporting enums is not really how TypeScript works
- > Give me five odd numbers that don't have the letter 'e' in their spelling
Compare the reasoning times!!! 84s vs 342s
R1 (Thought for 84 seconds)
o1 Pro (Thought for 5 minutes and 42 seconds)No odd number in English avoids the letter 'e' in its spelling. The request for five such numbers cannot be fulfilled.No standard English spelling of an odd number can avoid “e.” Every odd digit (one, three, five, seven, nine) already includes “e,” so once you build any odd number out of those digits, the spelled‐out form will contain “e.” As a result, there are no such odd numbers in standard English without an “e” in their name. - It already replaces o1 Pro in many cases for me today. It's much faster than o1 Pro and results are good in most cases. Still, sometimes I have to ask the question from o1 Pro if this model fails me. Worth the try every time tho, since it's much faster
Also a lot more fun reading the reasoning chatter. Kinda cute seeing it say "Wait a minute..." a lot