[ my public key: https://keybase.io/mrunkel; my proof: https://keybase.io/mrunkel/sigs/n0tmgW5E9sW6eB6MzNT00DyeVNlDItA2lITLnAAswtQ ]
- mrunkel parentI just wanted to say thank you. This is a great read.
- I tested "all supported" but this is explicitly for 5:
- That doesn't say what you think it does.
Quoting the judgement: "only works created by a human can be copyrighted under United States law, which excludes photographs and artwork created by animals or by machines without human intervention"
Clearly, the machine in question is responding to human prompts. The LLM didn't create this program on its own.
So I think these are still open issues.
- > This is an insanely expensive cluster built to show a benchmark. 68 node cluster serving only 15TB storage in total.
This reads to me (and the OP) that you are saying the purpose of this "insanely expensive cluster" was to "show a benchmark."
That's what OP is addressing in his response. No where do you mention anything about performance.
- It's an anthropomorphized bao bun. How much variance can you expect?
- They aren't. https://imgur.com/a/tNRuEpb
But how much variance can you reasonably expect from a logo based on an anthropomorphized bao bun?
- While parts of the objection might be legitimate for logistical reasons (ie, requiring the same supervisor for every shift), the unmitigated gall of the prosecutor is telling.
I know that the US judicial system is adversarial where winning is the only thing that matters, somehow we should see the prosecuting (who represents the people in their jurisdiction) standing up for justice.
- 3 points
- https://github.com/iced-rs/iced
Doesn’t seem to be.