- maxnoe parentBut on any modern CPU, clock speed won't be constant. It's not compile time constant, nor a runtime constant. Its variable over time. You'd have to record the clock speed over time and the ticks, so why not just record actual time?
- Completely new tunnel, but it will be connected to LHC, as they will use LHC to pre accelerate the particles.
Almost all accelerators built at CERN are still active and are a chain of pre-accelerator for LHC now:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider#/media/F...
- They integrate with radicale since May this year for card- and caldav
https://opencloud.eu/en/news/opencloud-calendar-and-contact-...
- > WGS84 sucks for mapping a sphere.
WGS84 is not a map projection, it's a geodetic reference frame prescribing a reference ellipsoid and reference positions of ground stations.
- Happened with real people too: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%B6hmermann_affair
- HTML + CSS is only half of the equation. The renderer is also important. So you need a layout engine that turns the HTML+CSS into something you can view.
Most of the time, this is one of the browser engines, but there are many more things.
There is e.g. weasyprint to produce PDFs from HTML and CSS, which would be the closest alternative to LaTeX taking HTML+CSS as input.
For simple documents, it's a much cleaner alternative, I used it to autogenerate documents in a python backend.
- The current goal is to redefine the second in terms of an optical frequency once clocks are available that offer a higher precision than 1 second over the lifetime of the universe.
- Not for gaming, but this was developed for checking plots: https://github.com/hdembinski/monolens
And works cross platform.
- You can express rest energy in electron volt, a unit of energy. The energy an electron gains by being accelerated in an electric field of 1 Volt.
But since E=mc², you can say the mass is X eV/c² and then people become lazy and forget the c² or even define a new system of units in which c=1.
- Both. You get untreated, just with iodine and iodine + fluoride.
https://www.bad-reichenhaller.de/de/produkte/alpensalze/alpe...
- TAI is not a time zone. Timezones are a concept of civil time keeping, that is tied to the UTC time scale.
TAI is a separate time scale and it is used to define UTC.
There is now CLOCK_TAI in Linux [1], tai_clock [2] in c++ and of course several high level libraries in many languages (e.g. astropy.time in Python [3])
There are three things you want in a time scale: * Monotonically Increasing * Ticking with a fixed frequency, i.e. an integer multiple of the SI second * Aligned with the solar day
Unfortunately, as always, you can only chose 2 out of the 3.
TAI is 1 + 2, atomic clocks using the caesiun standard ticking at the frequency that is the definition of the SI second forever Increasing.
Then there is UT1, which is 1 + 3 (at least as long as no major disaster happens...). It is purely the orientation of the Earth, measured with radio telescopes.
UTC is 2 + 3, defined with the help of both. It ticks the SI seconds of TAI, but leap seconds are inserted at two possible time slots per year to keep it within 1 second of UT1. The last part is under discussion to be changed to a much longer time, practically eliminating future leap seconds.
The issue then is that POSIX chose the wrong standard for numerical system clocks. And now it is pretty hard to change and it can also be argued that for performance reasons, it shouldn't be changed, as you more often need the civil time than the monotonic time.
The remaining issues are:
* On many systems, it's simple to get TAI * Many software systems do not accept the complexity of this topic and instead just return the wrong answer using simplified assumptions, e.g. of no leap seconds in UTC * There is no standardized way to handle the leap seconds in the Unix time stamp, so on days around the introduction of leap second, the relationship between the Unix timestamp and the actual UTC or TAI time is not clear, several versions exist and that results in uncertainty up to two seconds. * There might be a negative leap second one day, and nothing is ready for it
[1] https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/vdso.7.html [2] https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/chrono/tai_clock [3] https://docs.astropy.org/en/stable/time/index.html
- The headline is BS. At least completely misleading.
They only compare to some strange, Russian direct train.
The reference should be the current best connection, which would have one train switch.
The difference between this new connection and the fastest connection with one switch is ~15 minutes.
