- It should be renamed to currently accepted “international traditions and customs” (ITAC)
Queue’s/line’s in shop are not formally enforced by some authority to my knowledge, but most participants adhere to such order. (I would call it tradition)
- What you say is true, but idealists should not give up just because a murderer exists.
While it will not control the murderer, it can and will influence it (violence going 10% down is better than 0%)
- Like a bootcamp training.
- I known for very long time that c (and co) inherited the syntax from algol.
But only after long time I tried to check what Algol actually looked like. To my surprise, Algol does not look anything like C to me.
I would be quite interested in the expanded version of “C has inherited syntax from Algol”
Edit: apparently the inheritance from Algol is a formula: lexical scoping + value returning functions (expression based) - parenthesitis. Only last item is about visual part of the syntax.
Algol alternatives were: cobol, fortan, lisp, apl.
- > you don't need to fight over it, because it's a local display preference
This has limits.
Files produced with tab=2 and others with tab=8, might have quite different result regarding nesting.
(pain is still on the menu)
- Optimisation usually sacrifices some flexibility and/or robustness.
Valid if needed, but exists
- In short your stance is to sacrifice readability for performance.
Legit in some cases. But for usual business software, code is for humans (compiler will make machine code intended for the machine)
- You implied that I am regular user, which I am not.
- Looked up: Luandanum is opium dissolved in alcohol (for next clueless reader)
- In my defence, word “ago” was on the other line, so I kind of skipped it.
- Unintentional.
- It feels too dismissive.
While I do agree, that:
- there is a chance of something other causing the instant relief AND matching the moment of cannabis use
- health policy for population, should be made based on studies of population
At the same time, we must accept also some limitations of medical trials.
Models that interpret gathered results always includes a random part. Why? World is quite deterministic, why the randomness? Because one can’t make all possible measurements (money, sample size, time), one must choose the most promising practical setup.
Imagine hypothetical situation:
- there are 30 genotypes in population
- drug is highly effective only for 1 of those
- study doesn’t make genetic testing (also, it’s a parallel group study)
Such setup inflates required sample size to get statistically significant results. And even if significance is found, it will say that effectiveness is only 1/30, so not that good of a drug.
(30 is not the limit, think of a case with 300 types or 3000 types)
Human body is amazingly complex. It is not a solved problem.
If OP experienced instant relief of pain after smoking cannabis, it would be a logical action for OP to try it second time if pain reappears. (Given that cost/risk of such personal experiment is relatively low)
- Example.
Poisoning by methyl alcohol.
Ethyl alcohol is ok’ish (the regular stuff), while methyl alcohol can make you blind or dead even in small amounts.
- > there must have been perceived downsides at the time.
I also don’t know, but I seriously doubt there was cost benefit analysis.
My two bets would be:
- church/priests had power and they condemned most things, except for preying.
- it became widely known that opium is really obviously bad for you, after a bit of mental juggling that became “drugs are bad”, and then wholesale bans followed.
- So during what period cats were missing?
Duration is clear, start and end not clear
- That one seems unrelated with OS security model and root account. (One must squint really hard to see root and oop god object as same)
- If you use Kafka as a queue, then no difference. (Load balance a message between consumers)
But you can also use Kafka as pub-sub system (duplicate messages to each subscribers)
Messages are not deleted after consumption (configurable)
- > You don’t need genetics to ride a bike
Depends on how you define genetics. Starfish cant ride it; There exist genetic conditions that would make it difficult or impossible to ride a bike (first google search: inherited retinal diseases).
- You are free now.
(I bet it is described in the manual; but we will never know - I also have not read it)