1
point
ksec
Joined 53,086 karma
Edksec @ protonmail . com
https://ksec.mataroa.blog
London, Hong Kong and somehow California*. Often a Contrarian.
The unwritten rule of HN: You do not criticise The Rusted Holy Grail and the Riscy Silver Bullet.
Interest: JPEG-XL, AAC-LC, VVC / LCEVC, Patent Free AVC, FreeBSD, TigerBeetle, ZFS, DTrace, Vitess, Vespa, Objective-C, Java, Zig, Odin, Crystal, Ada, Ruby, Graal, Rails, 5G/6G, OpenPOWER, Apple/China, Supply Chain / Manufacturing, Retail.
@Google: Why No Pixel Phone in Hong Kong?
- 3 points
- 1 point
- > But you never hear about the probably endless companies and organizations that employ worthless checklists that do nothing but waste people's time.
Most if not all the bad checklist I have encountered are all for the same reason, they were not tested or poorly written, and most of the time both.
Not tested in terms the checklist was written by somebody who doesn't actually know how to do the whole project. Unlike Professionals like Doctor ands Pilot where they are well trained and the check list are well understood to be a reminder. The rational behind it were taught and even if not professionals will question if something they dont understands while most other in there field could immediately give a detail answer.
Another example would be HR writing an on-boarding checklist. 99% of the time I have seen those check list are intended to make HR's life easier. Not the candidate or applicants.
Checklist is also a clear and distilled form of writing. And as the saying goes I dont have time to write you a short letter, but I have time for a long one. Writing short points with clarity takes a long time. And not a skill set everyone process. Nor do they have the time to do it when it is not part of their job or KPI.
- >* Globo #1 in news...never heard of it (Latin Am. news)
I was surprised as well. And then Snapchat ( is that still a thing ? ) is higher than X ?
Shopee larger than Temu?
I assume a lot of these are Cloudflare customer's specific, or 1.1.1.1 DNS user specific.
- 4 points
- There is ConnextX-9 already which does 800Gbps in a single port. I am eagerly waiting for "Serving Netflix Video Traffic at ~~800Gb/s~~ 1.6Tbps and Beyond" from last time I posted it in 2022. [1]
- 116 points
- 2 points
- I wonder why M$ stopped putting out new Direct X? Direct X Ultimate or 12.1 or 12.2 is largely the same as Direct X 12.
Or has the use of Middleware like Unreal Engine largely made them irrelevant? Or should EPIC put out a new Graphics API proposal?
- >It's even more obvious when watching video where safari will be 5 to 10 points lower than Firefox.
Safari uses macOS for video so the points will be on macOS. Firefox uses it own internal video decoder. That is why image and video codec support on Safari is dependent on macOS upgrade not Safari.
- This makes me wonder if Canadian use full stop or period.
- 3 points
- 1 point
- 1 point
- I use all three.
Safari loses out when you run with a lot of Tabs. Both Chrome and Firefox knows when to unload tabs. ( Firefox even have about:unloads to tell you the order of Tabs it will unload! )
Try opening Tab Overview in Safari and it will start loading all the website for thumbnails, paging out to disk due to low memory, writing hundreds of GB to page. It also put Tabs on low running priority in the background rather than pausing them like Firefox or Chrome. ( Not sure if that is still the case with Safari 26, at least it was with 18 ). To combat that, restarting the browser time to time helps.
Safari is well tuned for iOS as a single tab, single page usage. On MacOS when doing many tabs it start to get slow and inefficient. And this is very much a Safari issue not an Webkit issue because Orion is a lot better at it.
And yes I have filed Radar report for many of the issues but I have come to the conclusion Apple doesn't care about multi tab usage on desktop Safari.
- 1 point
- >Technically.....
Since its birth, Firefox is still the only browser that manage multiple ( hundreds or in some cases, thousands! [1] ) tabs better than any browser. And in my view in the past 12 - 24 months Firefox has managed to be as fast as chrome. While Chrome also improved on its multiple Tab browsing experience.
Safari.... I dont know why this battery life argument keeps coming up because it is not the case. It hasn't been so for at least 5 - 6 years.
Mozilla could have played the trust angle when they have the good will and money. They could have invested into SaaS that provides better revenue generations other than getting it from Google. They could also have partnered with Wikipedia before they got rotten. But now I am not even sure if they still have the "trust" card anymore. Gekco is still hard to be embedded, XULRunner could have been Electron. They will need to get into survival mode and think about what is next.
[1] https://www.tomshardware.com/software/mozilla-firefox/firefo...
- Is this some sort of new account trolling? Parent specifically asked for non-Chinese products or non- Chinese company.
https://www.hackerneue.com/item?id=46293062