Preferences

herewulf
Joined 827 karma

  1. There's always an edge case. Speaking of which, here's someone who would really benefit from a hard column width limit and limited nesting that modern programmers (particularly ones using various IDEs) so carelessly violate these days.
  2. I think I'll take any LLM slop code over the written-on-phone-by-"developers" slop code.
  3. Not the parent but a project (glorified Bash script) called vcsh[1] has served me well over the years for managing multiple Git repositories containing my dotfiles (separation of concerns).

    Lately I have migrated some of that to Guix Home because the other half of the problem is having all the dependent programs necessary for the dotfiles installed automatically at the appropriate versions.

    The latter one especially falls into the realm of tinkering. :)

    [1]: https://github.com/RichiH/vcsh [2]: https://systemcrafters.net/craft-your-system-with-guix/guix-...

  4. Okay, IRC then!
  5. I have always been very interested in seeing repository metadata (issues, etc) kept in the code repository itself. Not technically easy, I know. I wonder if there are any current efforts that manage to make this work?
  6. Any Git clone is also technically a Git server, so no, they don't lose access to their own filesystem after graduating.
  7. If federation really works that well, then it sounds like Mastodon/ActivityPub is ripe for carrying Git repository metadata and discussion. Obviously Git development works very well with mailing lists, other than the centralized server requirement, awkwardness (for most users), and technical limitations of mailing lists. So then you just need your federated discussions to carry patches or point to publicly accessible repos and put some decent UI (of choice) on top of that.

    Even issues are mainly just discussions with some metadata attached and as long as they can be surfaced in a way to be attached to a project, then they could be created by anyone.

    Hmm.. Surely there is already effort being focused in this direction?

  8. Chemical weapons were not used in WWII because in WWI the combatants figured out that they were really ineffective.

    Modern nuclear weapons seem to be very effective, but as you note, it has only been tested once (when only one side had them).

  9. One would have to completely ignore the context of the last few months to not make a link in causality with basic inference.

    These are the same "serious media outlets" that repeat that same context in their articles over and over again as if readers haven't come anywhere near a news source in over a year.

    It's like they are back in school trying to hit that arbitrary 500 word requirement when it's entirely unnecessary. Modern journalism is neither serious nor rigorous.

  10. Ah yes, using the Coast Guard's aircraft carrier, stealth fighters, and their famous "Delta Force" commandos. I bet they even got a warrant to kick in Maduro's door and read him his rights!
  11. Why even have term limits if that is okay?

    No one has ever expected a former President to want to become a VP — a lower office.

  12. Because the US completely botched stabilizing the country despite 10s of thousands of troops on the ground for years. Meanwhile the indigenous insurgency and the previous to the invasion non-existent but subsequently massed foreign Al-Qaeda in Iraq both ensured no meaningful exports could be accomplished.

    In Venezuela it's extremely unclear how suddenly creating a giant power vacuum will allow the US to obtain Venezuela's oil.

    On one hand, this seems classic from the Trump Admin in that rash actions have been taken with no future plans in place (cf. DOGE), on the other hand this does appear in line with the promise of "no forever wars" (no sustained US ground presence) and if the US does actually end up with the oil, then it will be at a very low cost (in terms of US blood and treasure).

  13. I didn't know Maduro was responsible for protecting the US border. Perhaps he should be charged with "dereliction of duty"? To go along with his other trumped up charges (ha.. ha..) such as "possession of machine guns and other destructive devices".
  14. The not knowing is the point. From a security perspective, you have to assume the worst.

    And maybe that is F-Droid's point: Security through obscurity. If the build infrastructure with the signing keys is unknown, then it's that much harder for Bad Actor to do things like backdoor E2E encrypted communication apps. This is, of course, the weakness in E2E encryption in apps obtained from mainstream/commercial app stores. For all we know, these may already be backdoored depending on where it came from.

    However, the obscurity makes F-Droid hard to trust as an outsider to the project.

  15. Likely they are trying to make said list of open-source software easily accessible. The vast majority of users are incapable of compiling their own software. Probably it's better (for users' freedom, privacy, and a healthy Android FOSS ecosystem) to have these users obtaining software through an F-Droid "app store" than through Google Play.

    The goal that you suggest is interesting. It reminds me of Guix, where one can obtain binaries or one can build the entirety of packages oneself. All from the same system.

    Perhaps you could share how you are currently building software from source and/or F-Droid?

  16. And when your Cloudflare site is down, most of the Internet is down too! There's no downside!
  17. Battleships are meant to fight other battleships. And you don't nuke ships. They are a relic from WWI when ships still had to engage each other directly.

    They also filled a shore bombardment role. But you also don't use nukes for that (rather modern aircraft).

    Disclaimer: IANAS (I Am Not A Squid)

  18. I refuse to use this name. The historic Department is literally the US Army. The DoD is one echelon higher. It's simply retarded.
  19. Saying "linear algebra" to such people is about as effective as saying "abracadabra".
  20. I think we can all agree that obnoxious / potentially harmful features should be off by default.

    The authors of such a feature gave not more than a trifling thought to anyone's perspective but their own.

  21. In an equitable world, LLMs would only provide answers from <=1930 data (as of 1 January).

    Yet another argument for copyright being far too long.

  22. Imagine simply owning your digital music, video, and game purchases in your own lifetime.
  23. It's simply the reverse of oxidizing it (AKA combusting it).
  24. No major manufacturer is even approaching what Framework is trying to do, so I'm happy to cut them some slack in order to support a product philosophy that I believe in. My 12th Gen Framework 13 is certainly good enough in this respect.

    People have bought not so well made electric cars for the same reason (e.g.: Tesla).

    Your car analogy does not really hold up though, considering that anything but an absolutely awful car is quite repairable and (in the right hands) upgradable.

  25. My wife has a recent MBP (a compromise to get away from Windows) and it's slick, fast, and super reliable. But you hit the nail on the head: Linux. There is no substitute. That's one reason why I swear by my Framework 13.

    While they aren't the only manufacturer guaranteeing excellent Linux support, that and the upgradeability seal the deal.

    Speaking of the MBP, the fixed disk size is really frustrating. Historically this is the one part that was upgradeable on all laptops.

  26. Reading through material in context and actively removing the telling bits seems very focused to me.

    Furthermore, reading through long winded, dry legalese (or the like) and then occasionally marking it up seems like an excellent way to give the brain short breaks to continue on rather than to let the mind wander in a sea of text.

    I am for automating all the things but I can see pros and cons for both digital and manual approaches.

  27. I asked Gemini if this was true and my city blacked out.
  28. There is nothing to prepare for because the only possible war between the USA and China is a nuclear war and such a war has no victor. Both countries are "prepared" in terms of nuclear weapons.

    The USA is clearly not prepared to sacrifice any of its own cities to prevent an invasion of Taiwan.

    All this sabre rattling and military buildup only serves to put money in the pockets of the military industrial complex and/or build military capabilities for each country to exert its will within its own sphere of influence.

  29. What domestic drone industry?
  30. "Destroying Presidential norms"?! Heh. Wait until Fox News hears about the next guy. Oh, right. It doesn't work that way.

This user hasn’t submitted anything.

Keyboard Shortcuts

Story Lists

j
Next story
k
Previous story
Shift+j
Last story
Shift+k
First story
o Enter
Go to story URL
c
Go to comments
u
Go to author

Navigation

Shift+t
Go to top stories
Shift+n
Go to new stories
Shift+b
Go to best stories
Shift+a
Go to Ask HN
Shift+s
Go to Show HN

Miscellaneous

?
Show this modal