Preferences

helsinki
Joined 630 karma
moc.liamg@retarp.rovert

  1. It has been in the source code for like two months. I've been using it for a while now.
  2. Can you invite me? In the off chance, my email is in my profile, but reversed.
  3. Yeah, makes perfect sense, but you really lose a lot.
  4. No, I don’t. I built it inside of my employer’s walls (hedge fund), so I’d have to rebuild it from scratch in order to acquire paying customers (not a bad idea).
  5. Social currency, I guess. I work on the AI team, so it’s just part of the job.
  6. I built a GitHub-native coding / review agent that outperforms CodeRabbit (by a lot), and it only took me like two hundred hours. There are a few of us using it at work, meanwhile CodeRabbit is valued at $550M.
  7. Would anyone at Google be willing to tell me how many people are working on this project? I’ve been building something functionally similar for my employer, but it’s a nights and weekends project with only one contributor (me).
  8. A cheese knife.
  9. How do you use two of these massive monitors? They are stacked vertically?
  10. I wonder how it’s different from using playwright MCP? The prompts and screenshots, I guess?
  11. “will transfirm you from being a consumer to a producer”

    You mean, “will teach you to make REST calls instead of letting a script do it for you”.

    We are all consumers. Unless, of course, you work at one of three companies.

  12. I think that’s a decent approach, but doesn’t the performance of a Neovim terminal bother you? It simply does not feel as good as a native terminal pane. It’s not as bad as VSCode’s terminal pane, but it still leaves something to be desired.
  13. It’s more common that they lead technological advancements in IDEs, not follow. Neovim in particular.
  14. This is not a shared sentiment across the buy side. I’m guessing you work at a bank?
  15. This works in theory and somewhat in practice but it is not as clean as people make it seem, as someone who has spent tens of thousands on Opus tokens and worktrees - it’s just not that great. It works, but it’s just, ugh, boring, super tedious, etc. at the end of it all, you’re still sitting around waiting for Claude to merge conflicts.
  16. So far, it’s relatively bug-free well-written code that I’ve forked to work behind the walls of a hedge fund, and it works, but the reality is that it doesn’t provide anything that some terminal windows and git worktrees can’t offer. Am I missing something?

    You really need to add more features, because I struggle to find a compelling reason for advanced users to use it.

  17. I use Vertex and work at a hedge fund. I just spam Claude Code Opus all day long. There’s not much to it, other than I sit at a chair for 12-16 hours and spam poor (actually, rich) Claude. I don’t use the cc usage too - I just look at my GCP bill :(
  18. My curmudgeonly genius Q/Kdb+ programmer of a co-worker, whom claims to be immune to the impact of LLMs, is going to be fucking pissed when he hears about Qython.
  19. Interesting. I use Opus exclusively (like $1000/day in tokens) via Claude Code. Do you really think Sonnet is better for programming? I’m not sure I agree, though I’d love to save $900/day by taking you up on it.
  20. Doesn’t Apple’s new model do the same thing? https://huggingface.co/apple/DiffuCoder-7B-cpGRPO
  21. I’ve been writing an equivalent of uv for the R language at work, and it’s quite daunting / unwieldy. I was feeling bad about it, but then I reminded myself that uv has hundreds of contributors and my project only has one.
  22. If you’re making real money trading, you’re not telling people about it.
  23. Thanks, GPT 4.1. It told me the same thing twelve hours ago when I asked it what was at the top. “what’s north of the North Pole”?
  24. These bug bounties pay peanuts. Sad.
  25. Has anyone solved scoped permissions in multi-agent systems? For instance, if a user asks an orchestrator agent to:

    1) Search GitHub for an issue in their repo.

    2) Fix the issue and push it to GitHub.

    3) Search Jira for any tasks related to this bug, and update their status.

    4) Post a message to slack, notifying the team that you fixed it.

    Now, let’s assume this agent is available to 1000 users at a company. How does the system obtain the necessary GitHub, Jira, and Slack permissions for a specific user?

    The answer is fairly obvious if the user approves each action as the task propagates between agents, but how do you do this in a hands-free manner? Let’s assume the user is only willing to approve the necessary permissions once, after submitting their initial prompt and before the orchestrator agent attempts to call the GitHub agent.

    If anyone could offer any advice on this, I would really appreciate it. Thank you!

  26. I don’t see any prompts?
  27. Does anyone use Skyvern to build their websites? I’m wondering how I might benefit from using an agentic browser workflow instead of a playwright MCP server for building a web UI?
  28. You're going to need to speed up the visualizer. I think you're losing a lot of potential users to the loading time.

This user hasn’t submitted anything.

Keyboard Shortcuts

Story Lists

j
Next story
k
Previous story
Shift+j
Last story
Shift+k
First story
o Enter
Go to story URL
c
Go to comments
u
Go to author

Navigation

Shift+t
Go to top stories
Shift+n
Go to new stories
Shift+b
Go to best stories
Shift+a
Go to Ask HN
Shift+s
Go to Show HN

Miscellaneous

?
Show this modal