- 3 points
- Interesting. Could I use this to automate testing of massive web applications (100s of screens). And potentially load test?
- I’m sure you’ve heard this.
Rough pre rev valuation!
Every engineer +$500k
Every MBA -$1m.
- 4 points
- So America is actually Russia?
- 13 inch Mac book air.
After years of large MBp I switched to 15 inch MB air. Then the 13 inch. It’s moment of inertia is closer to the palm holding - i.e., it feels very light.
Screen is a bit tight. So all I do I crank up the size (setResX), put on pair of 0.5 readers and voila instant large screen. I can go all the way to 2560x and still read and work.
- This is great. My WiFi is provided by a microwave link - it’s good but expensive.
- Interesting - hadn't considered that possibility - makes sense
- Great points. The whole doc is vague and filled with trap doors.
Best to get a citizenship asap
- I see your point. Thank you.
I think most non legally inclined people (like me) would say CBP yanked my GC.
Your point being that - nope, they just enforced the law.
Right?
- Good points.
Thanks for sharing the link. Yikes! It looks like all of part 9 is in play. Ie one had better be absolutely truthful - or self decline, who would ever do that?
Also, the problem with the legal definition of “a disqualification requirement” is it can be vague and subject to change.
Would I be correct in saying that a strict adherence to USA law is mandatory?
- Good point. A lot of people don’t know this.
If the company makes it - the venture can be in legal jeopardy.
- Actually they can.
For eg. Some green card holders live overseas. They are required to visit here periodically to keep status alive.
I know of cases where their green cards were revoked
- Isn’t the green card risk based on a couple of items in the green card process The visa process and the person’s assertions to those visa questions For example - did you every x? And the required answer is No Let’s assume the person did commit X but answers No Years go by and the person gets a green card. The underlying assertion was a lie - therefore the whole stream of events later becomes questionable. The second situation is a new item being added. For example consider the hypothetical scenario that When the applicant filled out his forms - greenpeace was legit. And the applicant was a greenpeace member. Years later the applicant becomes a green card holder. Now years later. The govt classifies greenpeace a terror org. Is the green card holder under threat?
- Isn’t the green card risk based on a couple of items in the green card process
The visa process and the person’s assertions to those visa questions
For example - did you every x? And the required answer is No
Let’s assume the person did commit X but answers No
Years go by and the person gets a green card.
The underlying assertion was a lie - therefore the whole stream of events later becomes questionable.
The second situation is a new item being added. For example consider the hypothetical scenario that
When the applicant filled out his forms - greenpeace was legit. And the applicant was a greenpeace member.
Years later the applicant becomes a green card holder.
Now years later. The govt classifies greenpeace a terror org.
Is the green card holder under threat?
- Yet another AWS service - dead.
- 1 point
- Curious what is angle here -
- These signatures have morphed into signaling one’s political leaning. It’s a good idea to keep such signals (whether intended or not) out of official communications.
For example, the Swastika was/is a religious symbol to billions of people. But became a political symbol and is a trigger point today
- 3 points
- 2 points
- Great stuff well done. What is your latency for real time Audio?
- 8 points
- 2 points
- Former car designer here - big3. The root cause is tax policies. Any vehicle classified as a “truck” is protected from overseas competition by a 25 pc tariff (jfk era), and since Clinton/Bush there is a tax write off available to business owners if the weight was more than 5600# it’s now 6500#.
I.E., there is a tax incentive to make trucks and buy them.
The occupant safety regulations means we make the worlds safest vehicles (for occupants) - roll over regulations have made the an and bill pillars thicker.
If we manage to remove the tariff protection and remove the tax incentives to buy trucks - we will save lives.
- 1 point
- 2 points
- 2 points
- Hi.
I can link you up with a global payment processing fintech. Mid market/smb ERp and CRM are being commoditized. The fintech works with these cominies to bolt on the payment opportunity on the AR and AP side. For example a $10m year biz represents $10-$18m in payments. I.E., about a $100 to $200k profit oppty - recurring.
Open sourcing is a good idea - it allows for platform innovation and adoption - while regulated services becomes the profit driver.
We also looked at Auth0 and Fusionauth - KeyCloak won.
We did not check Teseral - could you help me understand why I would choose Tesseral over the other 3?