- freejazzYou could have just said "no" or maybe admitted that "killing" painting was overblown, or maybe that it was not an accurate descriptor at all if you're argument is that it just "changed" painting.
- >The problem seems to be that the Waymo cars did exactly as you requested and treated the intersections like 4 way stops but kept getting displaced by more aggressive drivers who simply slowed and rolled.
So, you're saying Waymo can't handle a regular 4 way stop sign given how everyone else on the road drives? That's not a problem?
- > The difference is the Waymos failed in a way that prevented potential injury
No one was injured this time but that's a huge assumption on your part
- >Depends, the camera killed painting and is a positive for art in my opinion
Have you been to a contemporary art museum?
- Weird, I'm an attorney and no one is getting rid of associates in order to have LLMs do the research, no less so when they actually hallucinate sources (something associates wont do). I can't imagine that being significantly different in other domains.
- And?
- Well you just posted, telling someone else what Zuck's political interests might be, based upon what even you described as meaningless performative behavior.
- > Zuck tattooed rainbow flag while Biden was President and is currently macho-man crusader. If
Funny how you say this but insist you're not the one being fooled right now!
- >When you ask humans however there are all kinds of made-up "facts" they will tell you. Which is the point the parent makes (in the context of comparing to LLM), not whether some legal database has wrong cases.
Context matters. This is the context LLMs are being commercially pushed to me in. Legal databases also inherit from reality as they consist entirely of things from the real world.
- > Hallucinations are a feature of reality that LLMs have inherited.
Really? When I search for cases on LexisNexis, it does not return made-up cases which do not actually exist.
- Yes.
- >The freedom to do something has nothing to do with how easy it is to do, or even the absolute viability.
Are you confusing me with someone else?
> For a basic example of the latter, every US citizen by birth has the freedom to become President some day, yet of course it is literally impossible for more than 0.000006% of people to achieve that within their expected lifetimes
I have no idea what this has to do with my point and you have not adequately explained the relevancy either.
- > There's tremendous difference.
No there isn't. They are the different sides of the same coin. Any freedom from something is a constraint against someone else doing that thing.
- Great point. It's all so funny because DOGE was just so ridiculous on the face of itself.
- Here's one example. Have you not been following DOGE? You do come off like you're disingenuously concern trolling over something you don't agree with politically.
https://krebsonsecurity.com/2025/04/whistleblower-doge-sipho...
- >Do you have any actual evidence of this?
Any evidence it was an actual audit?
- In the US you can't sue without having obtained or applied for a registration. If the registration does not grant, you cannot sue. You cannot get a registration for code developed by AI.
- "reasoning."
- > In that way, perhaps we now have a monotexture of writing, but also perhaps more interesting ideas being shared.
They aren't your ideas if its coming out of an LLM