Preferences

flipped
Joined 39 karma

  1. I don't think the kind of crowd IPFS attracts would wanna use the default config. Most ould choose to configure according to their setup.
  2. Stable and yet never used in live env. It's being rewritten and not at all stable. I don't expect it to become the standard anyway.
  3. You are being pedantic and annoying. Why would you even respond in off-topic response? Your comments have served nothing to the topic on-hand.
  4. Namecoin sounds very promising, first time hearing about it.
  5. They don't own the network. The people who run the relays do. v2 wasn't shutdown in an instant. It was necessary and you could have just redirected your users to v3 and tell them to use it instead but you had to whine about your short-commings on Tor?

    It's not only for high-security. It's for the state-of-the-art anonymity.

  6. Financial freedom and private transactions. It's also mined on consumer hardware making it far more decentralized than bitcoin.
  7. LE relies on opsec failures which is very clear on their busts. They are incompetent hypocrite fools.
  8. Freenet is promising but it's not even fully done. Experimental stage. I am also skeptic of their more usage of LLM generated code these days.
  9. What? That's the laziest argument against IPFS. Bind it on one interface or just use a VM.
  10. Tor and monero will save the world.
  11. It's literally outline by Tor Project team, if you care to even read from official sources.
  12. > by using the browser you are not contributing to the networK

    That's false to some extent. Tor's promise comes from it's vast population of users. The more users it has, the better it is to improve everyone's anonymity. So in a way, even by using it, you are helping Tor network. And please, save the "criminal" bs (meant for the original comment).

  13. I like IPFS but decentralized storage is just awfully expensive to maintain without any reward. Main IPFS mirrors don't tolerate AA content, it's taken down very quickly.
  14. I am aware of POW but that hasn't stopped the DDoS. If you look at chart from few months back, there was significant hit due to crazy DDoS carried out by DrugHub which was evident in a Dread post.
  15. Operational excellence is of course dependent on the operator but I would still think it's far easier to bring up onion as it's disposable and works behind NAT'ed VMs which makes it further easy to run.

    I don't know anything about Nostr since it does not focus on anonymity and isn't as old as Tor (more than 2 decades of research and application), I wouldn't rely on Nostr for anything serious.

  16. I have no clue why you're getting downvoted but ygg is a solid option but it would overwhelm the network since AA has intense traffic.
  17. I have seen Tor network take a hit when there's fight between darknet marketplaces. It's certainly an issue.
  18. Better have a .onion. It's almost impossible to seize and you control the keys. YOU ARE THE OWNER, not some for-profit registrar. Onions should be the default, it's secure (you own the keys), decentralized and far better than relying on CAs for encryption.
  19. You are missing the entire point. The money itself is fake and artificially generated at will by these authorities. Monero and any major coin has actual value because you can't just create out of thin air. Fiat is on it's edge. Look at monero's price, it's growing at record breaking point. Why? People realize it's true value and anonymity/privacy aspects.
  20. Yes, we need .onion on every site. Not only is it censor resistant but also provides anonymity for user and the onion server,.
  21. Yes, it goes both ways but people always focus on monero's crime use which by the way indirectly hardens the protocol. Most people don't like to say it but it's the truth. The world's highest ranking agencies and billion dollar companies like chanalysis cannot break it, which means it actually works and the reason those actors wanna crack monero is because of some "illicit" usage.

    It's an indirect audit being conducted all the time. The best chainanalysis could come up with was running malicious nodes to deanonymize users.

  22. They can't do jackshit. They are totally clueless and run by a bunch of extremely incompetent boomers. Next, they will try to ban Tor but guess what that can't happen as Tor is censorship-resistant!
  23. > Your own private bank which cannot interact with most financial institutions and merchants?

    That's the whole point. Why would an privacy coin wanna interact with a corrupted banking sector? It's clearly not for you since you can't even see the actual point. You can use the banks, like everyone and let them profile (and sell your data), track and own your whole life.

  24. Banks launder money for extreme illicit activities. Look at TD Bank or HSBC, they were find record breaking for laundering cartel money. Your naivety is not surprising since you refuse to dig deeper and discover the actual truth. Banks and govt doesn't care about you. Their purpose is to deceive, steal and manipulate their true motive from general population. They own your whole life.
  25. And fund wars with those taxes? Monero is literally being your own private bank, there's no concept of tax.

This user hasn’t submitted anything.

Keyboard Shortcuts

Story Lists

j
Next story
k
Previous story
Shift+j
Last story
Shift+k
First story
o Enter
Go to story URL
c
Go to comments
u
Go to author

Navigation

Shift+t
Go to top stories
Shift+n
Go to new stories
Shift+b
Go to best stories
Shift+a
Go to Ask HN
Shift+s
Go to Show HN

Miscellaneous

?
Show this modal