emodendroket
Joined 21,913 karma
- emodendroketWell, they just love complaining. You won't find many who profess to like DLC, yet that sells.
- They're better than one might expect at diagnosing issues from the error output or even just screenshots.
- No. But most software products are nowhere near that sensitive and very few of them are developed with the level of caution and rigor appropriate for a safety-critical component.
- It doesn’t seem like making money Is the object.
- They all offer some "memory" cross chat now and they're all more annoying than helpful. Not really compelling. You can pretty easily export your chat if you want.
- > “Part of the reason why I like this questioning is the more constitutional you want to make it, the more precise you want to make it, the more you’re going to need my product,” Karp said. His reasoning is that if it’s constitutional, you would have to make 100% sure of the exact conditions it’s happening in, and in order to do that, the military would have to use Palantir’s technology, for which it pays roughly $10 billion under its current contract.
Make your own judgment but I thought that it was a reasonable inference if his answer is about how he’s got dollar signs in his eyes that he doesn’t see a moral imperative here.
- However sloppily expressed I think the intent is clear: he is saying “I don’t think it’s important that they comply with laws concerning their conduct, but they’re drumming up business for me, so I don’t mind.”
- I would say it is pretty hard to take that seriously as a justification when they’re also letting Juan Orlando Hernandez go.
- OK, AUMF. Sorry for the imprecision.
- I'd say that many of the people upset now didn't like that either but it at least had the pretense of bothering with a declaration of war.
- When he says "push to make it constitutional" what he means is push to make them comply with complex rules.
- I feel like the headline kind of misleads since what he actually says is, essentially, "yeah, go nuts trying to limit it, then they need to buy from me." Which is still crass but not what the headline suggests.
- Well I mean, they didn't "just give homeless people money" or just give them homes or any of those things though. I think the issue might be the method and not the very concept of devoting resources to the problem.
- If for no other reason than they're actively attacking renewable capacity even amid surging demand
- No, they don't all look like that, the brackets are an indication you're reaching into .NET and calling .NET stuff instead of "native" PowerShell commands which take the form Verb-Noun. Which can be a legitimate thing to do, but isn't the first choice and seems like an example deliberately chosen to make PS look more awkward than it is. I question whether, for this particular example, `echo 'export MY_VAR="my_value"\n' >> ~/.bashrc && source ~/.bashrc` is really all that intuitive either (and hopefully you didn't accidentally write `>` instead of `>>` and nuke the rest of the file).
- I like when they tell you they’ve personally confirmed a fact in a conversation or something.
- PowerShell is completely suitable. People are just used to bash and don’t feel the incentive to switch, especially with Windows becoming less relevant outside of desktop development.
- Yeah I think Sonnet is still the best in my experience but the limits are so stingy I find it hard to recommend for personal use.
- In practice if you really care about fixing bugs/cleaning things up the thing that works best is sneaking that into feature work somehow.
- Does that happen because the player understands some tendency of their opponent that will cause them to not play optimally? Or is it genuinely some flaw in the machine’s analysis?