Github: https://github.com/KaySackey
Blog: https://medium.com/@kay.sackey/
Email: kay at the domain 9cloud.us
Homepage: Maybe someday?
---
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/dismantlethesun; my proof: https://keybase.io/dismantlethesun/sigs/nh09OotjBtFSa-ftnDJ33n1cWpemiX-4IkD8BFAUjAY ]
- Corporate punishments can be applied on a fine grain. Every store, every instance, every choice becoming a 10k fine can rapidly make even relatively rare acts untenable as a cost of doing business.
- I think it is. The irony is that the people you hired to help make your machine seem human are seen as mechanical because of their distinct and uniformly sophisticated tone. Thus we have a situation that’s contrary to expectations.
- Ironically OpenAI used Kenyan workers[1] to train its AI and now we've come to the point where Kenyans are being excluded because they sound too much like the AI that they helped train.
- Barclays used to operate under Barclays Bank PLC. IMO, if disambiguation was problematic online they would have reverted back to that name.
You bring up good points, but I don't think that company naming has to be 100% proof against confusion, it's just one more helpful thing for consumers to identify whom they are doing business with.
In the case of close names like "Barkley", if they're doing banking, there is probably a trademark case against if they actually use it to confuse customers.
Intrestingly enough, "Barkley Holdings" was registered by competing bank HSBC: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/c...
- In many countries, company names are unique to that country. And combined with country TLDs controlled by the nation-state itself, it'd be possible for at least barclays.co.uk to be provably owned by the UK bank itself when a EV cert is presented by the domain.
In the US though, every state has it's own registry, and names overlap without the power of trademark protection applying to markets your company is not in.
- I'm not the OP, but I do have an annectote.
We've got an backend pipeline that does image processing. At every step of the pipeline, it would make copies of small (less than 10MB) files from an S3 storage source, do a task, then copy the results back up to the storage source.
Originally, it was using AWS but years ago it was decided that AWS was not cost effective so we turned to another partner OVH and Backblaze.
Unfortunately, the reliability and throughput of both of them isn't as consistent as AWS and this has been a constant headache.
We were going to go back to AWS or find a new partner, but I nominated we use NFS. So we build nothing, pay nothing, get POSIX semantics back, and speed has gone up 3x. At peak, we only copy 40GB of files per day, so it was never really necessary to use S3 except that our servers were distributed and that was the only way anyone previously could think to give each server the same storage source.
While this isn't exactly what the OP and you are talking about, I think it illustrates a fact: SaaS software was seen as the hammer to all nails, giving you solutions and externalizing problems and accountability.
Now that either the industry has matured, building in-house is easier, or cost centers need to be reduced, SaaS is going be re-evaluated under the context of 'do we really need it'?
I think the answer to many people is going to be no, you don't need enterprise level solutions at all levels of your company, especially if you're not anywhere near the Fortune 1000.
- > Corporations have hijacked a concept that should exist on human timescales.
I feel like this is true, but anytime I speak with colleagues in the arts (even UX and visual designers), they all say they are happy with copyright being lifetime of the owner + XX years. They (a) want the income for their legacy in case their products are still in use or appreciated decades later and (b) they want to control the output of their intellect.
As for the sniffling of creativity? They don't see that. If you can produce something, it's easy to only focus on the finer aspects.
An example would be software developers thinking only of code copyright as meaningfully applying to full applications but the functions that make up the codebase are just concepts easily reproduced, so it doesn't matter that technically the functions are also copyright protected.
- We're not in the US (hence all the power outages), so our recepits are 60% cash, 30% Mobile Money (our country specific accounts attached to your cell phone number), ~5% neighborhood credit for regulars and 10% for tourists using credit cards.
Even though we can accept cards for everyone, transaction fees means no one wants to use it.
Credit cards payments do work during blackouts, but process slowly. It goes from <30 seconds to receipt to 10 minutes+. The bank software just continually retries until it gets all the data it needs.
We take table reservations over the phone, or via WhatsApp. There's no real complexity to it. The data just needs to be with us at one location, the resturaunt, since that's the same place the customer will be coming to. Being online grants us nothing.
- I think there's an opportunity here for small businesses who typically don't have a lot of people managing them.
I run a resturaunt. Resturaunt software (POS, scheduling, table reservations) has many saas solutions, but I've personally seen these problems:
- POS requires cellular for some legal reason, but celluar connection is poor inside a mall
- Power goes out, backup services bring cell networks & fiber back online but not in a uniform manner so service is slow and the Saas times out too quickly to be used
- 2 factor auth won't work because cell systems are degraded
And in all these cases, there wasn't a good reason for the software to be fully online. The usage was by 1 or 2 managers and they all shared the same computer located inside the business.
- Protects them from what may I ask? I live in a city where chickens are permitted, and my neighbors chickens are all roaming the streets free-range, and their greatest danger is cars which roosters can't stop.
- To put it in perspective, "we" on HN are like hairdressers who all chose to charge for our services.
So it's less of a complaint and more of well meaning advise that he too should work for pay.
- Why is capitalism only creating homeless encampments in San Fran and not generally in the US? Maybe it’s not capitalism at fault here but a government that is unwilling or unable to supply standard social safety nets like homeless shelters and addiction therapy.
- Bard gives me some nonsense about opening the door then touching the lightbulb to see if it's hot.
I think it thought this was a trick question.
- Then it looks like everyone is happy on both sides, right? This is good news.
Big win for those who care about privacy over all else.
- What if my millionaire neighbor burns down the house instead?
- No one wants mass shootings. People just disagree on how best to prevent them and what’s most important about life.
Throwing fuel on the fire just leads to hastier emotional decisions not better decisions.
- There are more D grade companies than A or B grade companies combined.
- In case anyone gets the wrong idea, the author of the post is going to the Kings coronation and responds to criticism against that.
In fact the author calls out that their younger self would have been against thus, but now that they are older they have different views.
- That's a fairly bad faith argument. The earth neither has agency or insurance of its own to pay out costs.
If instead someone comes and burns down my house, I would hate it if they only had to give me a "equivalent functionality" tent in the wilderness because the law considers all shelters to be equal.
Apple has shortcuts, but they haven’t propped it up like a standard that other people can use.
To contrast this is something you can use even if you have nothing to do with Claude, and your tools created will be compatible with the wider ecosystem.