- braiampIf Firefox is just a browser, it will not get any money.
- > The problem is that Mozilla keeps jumping on fads instead of focusing on their browser core
No, the problem is that Mozilla needs money if they want to stop leaning off Google, and people are simply too blind by their hatred of AI that doesn't figure out that Mozilla needs money. What is giving shit loads of money right now? A-fucking-I. If their investors portfolio doesn't include AI on their products, nobody will give them even a second look, much less the funds they need. Mozilla isn't jumping on fads, it's jumping towards were money is.
You want Mozilla to stop doing that? Guarantee their moneis flow. Otherwise, you are a consumer of a free product and you don't get to decide how the free product gets financed. Luckily for you, they haven't decided to make _you_ the product.
- It didn't. They downloaded 43 GB instead of 152 GB, according to SteamDB: https://steamdb.info/app/553850/depots/ Now it is 20 GB => 21 GB. Steam is pretty good at deduplicating data in transit from their servers. They are not idiots that will let developers/publishers eat their downstream connection with duplicated data.
https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/sdk/uploading#AppStructur...
- FYI, it works on Linux, so as far as I'm aware, it only seems to care about you flying around.
- This is funny, considering that someone that worked on the defense industry (guide missile system) found a memory leak on one of their products, at that time. They told him that they knew about it, but that it's timed just right with the range of the system it would be used, so it doesn't matter.
- Do DMARC report tools like opendmarc-reports [0] comply with that section? Which tool have you seen that complies?
- There's a couple of terms in contract law, like fairness of obligations, unconscionability, disproportionate penalty, excessive advantage, etc. that the US seems to have forgotten. In the EU and other countries such... aberrations are struck down and unenforceable. People are still scared silly, but the ones that protest are usually left alone.
- I find interesting that despite many years of being reminded that DYI market doesn't represent a significant portion of these sales... we are still thinking that individual customers are the one driving the consumption. The one driving this are big OEMs like Dell, HP, Lenovo, etc.
- The problem here is that companies seems to not be the wiser to such tactics and creators are left holding the bag by such aggression.
- Note, and this is very important: marsf posted this at 2am pacific time. Kiki responded at 6am (I don't know it's timezone, but presuming anywhere in the US, it is literally the earliest it could have responded). Then afterwards, marsf have posted a response publicly. So, we don't know what happened since then. There have been 1 day and a half-ish and coordinating between timezones is interesting, to say the least.
- Dude, if someone is saying "hey we will pack up, we have nothing to do here" out of the blue, I would like a more nuanced conversation that written text could not hope to convey. We are humans and while reading is perfectly capable of relying information, it's unable to rely intention accurately. There's ton of information that is conveyed by the inflection of voice, demeanor, body language, etc.
- OWASP usually gives you sane defaults https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Password_Stor...
- > A cynical modern legal strategy is to bombard people with frivolous legal actions that only the well-heeled can afford
Why only describe them and not go for the easiest example: Nintendo.
- Interesting. I've done a light thread following of this group, but it seems to exists only since February of this year. That's... an interesting timing.
- Why should wikipedia protect itself from fringe, when it doesn't need to try to? If your fringe theory becomes the widely accepted one, it will naturally change the wording of the article, just based on sourcing alone.
- Wikipedia is not meant to appear neutral, it's meant to "mirror the current consensus of mainstream scholarship [... aka] 'accepted knowledge'". Basically, if the accepted knowledge of an event is that it is not a genocide, Wikipedia has to reflect _that_. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. It doesn't have an stance. It just copies and transmit as accurately as possible, the current understanding from qualified sources. You can literally see it in the "balance" section of this article.
- The top one is usually a background speaker, and not the focus of the scene. It is extremely rare that directors do that anyways.
- I remember watching a video a decade ago, of someone doing review of the subs for each group that was doing Black Rock Shooter, specifically the wheelchair scene, because what it's said has to be taken within the context of what's presented.
- > The easiest way is to actively work to make a high-profile project successful
Oh, my sweet summer child. Do you really believe that I would be allowed to be able to make a high profile project successful? I literally have been sidelined of many high-profile projects were they failed in the precise way I said it would fail if continuing the path we were on which is caused by actively working to make it successful. Telling your boss they are wrong and why tend to not work when your boss already have an idea on its head about how it will work.
- That comment is... weird, considering they disabled the accounts of certain International Court of Justice that were individually targeted.