Preferences

boringg
Joined 7,053 karma

  1. The claim is that website was providing back information for about 3-4 years because they didn't like Tesla. That invalidates them as a source because they have a bias against that company. Not as you say "musk is really a victim of the website".

    I do appreciate your excellent level of trolling though - we could use better level of intelligence out there.

  2. FALSE the claim is that website was anti Tesla while Tesla was trying to build out the electric car market up until about 2018. Which is the funniest thing given that they are a supposedly pro electric vehicles website per name.

    They switched once they realized Tesla was actually manufacturing a successful car at the time.

    It's worth remember how these companies think historically instead of whitewashing the past.

  3. Actually that is incorrect - they were historically very against Tesla as a company until 2015-2018 being hugely skeptical of Tesla.
  4. I'm sorry spark advocacy doesn't qualify as a good source (that's wikipedias source).
  5. Yeah but without that your just making stuff up and nobody wants that except you.
  6. Peak approval for Trudeau was over 64% - Carney hasn't hit that high water mark yet. Now peak to trough - I think Trudeau probably had the biggest fall.
  7. I agree - I noticed this as well. Also feels like it such an upsetting story that someone was motivated to really to the bottom of it. They also probably knew that if the story got traction people would be running down there own checks.

    I mean it does feel like that should be standard operation for journalism on bigger stories but I think our expectations from journalists have really fallen over the last 5 years with all the slop coming in.

  8. Honestly sometimte people are the absolute worst - I feel like there no bottom to depravity.
  9. I agree ive hooked up apple tv to override the crappy subsidized smart tv built ins that spy on you. That works until apple changes leadership and new leadership starts significantly mining data and caring less about privacy. It will happen at some point, not on Cooks term but someone else im sure of it.
  10. How good are the rats and can we start using rats instead of bots? Get them gainfully employed.
  11. Lack of capability, mismanagement, misinformation to name a few
  12. It so clearly going to take down professional sports at some point - or make a complete mockery of them.
  13. Honestly smells like they are trying to raise more capital by selling another potential revenue arm by leveraging on AI hype.

    Is it possible? Yes. Is it probably that an early stage company like this can provide this at scale and have it work…

  14. Iter still not getting fusion
  15. If your making the slippery slope argument sure I can agree there is a risk.

    However its saying digital validation for federal benefits - I mean given the amount of fraud in the US social security system of recent years it seems like having some kind of protection is important to not waste our tax payers benefit. And if you cross the border you are immediately in a digital system in the US.

    That said this isn't saying digital identity for websites similar to what AUS is proposing.

This user hasn’t submitted anything.