1. azazel75 Jan 27, 2024

   Some years ago with a friend we built a Lasersaur ( https://lasersaur.com ) from scratch. It is equipped with a 130 w CO2 laser. Amazing open source project. Unfortunately the guy that stays it abandoned the project, but there a ton of resources there
2. azazel75 Dec 5, 2023

   The license kinda sucks though: ``` 3. USE RESTRICTIONS

   Licensee is expressly forbidden from:

   (a) Incorporating, modifying, or using the Software as part of any other product or service; ```

3. azazel75 Sep 13, 2019

   "Before Ethernet was common, BNC coaxial cables were used on some NICs as well"

   Yes, at that time Ethernet was coaxial as well, the 10Base2

4. azazel75 May 8, 2019

   So we live in a society that isn't able to find the resources to teach someone how to read and get free... Instead that people can buy an Android phone and become a slave of the technology... what a shame
5. 1 point Apr 19, 2018

   New version (0.9) of JavaScripthon Python3-to-ES6 compiler is available

   0 comments azazel75 gitlab.com
6. azazel75 Jun 2, 2017

   That's like a Google tax, with the plus that you consciously agree to let it track you more than ever... wtf!
7. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016

   I could assure you that even transcrypt cannot transpile Django.

   It does multiple inheritance with a polyfill and overally is much more "fatter" than JavaScripthon.

   But with JavaScripthon you can use any tool available in JS land to accomplish the same goal. Want to use Backbone's extend()? Use it.. want to use react's createClass() mixin?, the same

8. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016

   It's in development, as many others software projects are, and is far from complete. The goal is to translate as much of core semantics as possible, but i doubt that all the core semantics will be translated. One for all is multi inheritance which is currently unsupported by current Javascript syntax. Even more, when you use an object such a list, it's really a JS Array that will be manipulated in the end, so you will have to use array.push() to add instead of python's list.append()

   But Translating something like Django is out of scope for all the transpilers, it would mean also converting sql drivers and so on? Does this really make any sense? Maybe you have a look at emscripten https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/wiki

9. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016

   It cannot be used to convert python frameworks to javascript, nor Django nor any other
10. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016

    Good :-)

    Do you have any link for this chrome detail about optimization?

    str(x) conversion is missing... i'll will implement it asap

11. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016

    The main reason is... context switching, also i'm a big fan of python's standard library, but I have yet to do any complete work just with it.
12. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016

    1) it renders import and from...import statements to equivalent ES6 imports. If you use something like Webpack down the pipeline you can already mix ES6 imports and CommonJS requires. Also, BabelJS by default transpiles ES6 imports to CommonJS requires.

    2) What do you mean exactly?

    3) There's no direct from-python loader, but the compilation can be splitted in two steps with the BabelJS Webpack loader used for the latter

13. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016

    I'm a big fan of RapydScript, unfortunately it requires nodejs and I would prefer not have to.. but hey, there is a space for everybody ;-)
14. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016

    It's implementable really and it is half-implemented, have a look at the call conventions... additional keyword arguments can be specified without any problem

    The problem is that there's no kwargs equivalent in js land.. and probably i don't want to wrap any call to make it possible.

15. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016

    Yes, I drink it everyday
16. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016

    Your post seems quite imprecise about Python's semantics...
17. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016

    ops, sorry for that. Issues are enabled now ;-)

This user hasn’t submitted anything.