1. azazel75 Jan 27, 2024 parent

   Some years ago with a friend we built a Lasersaur ( https://lasersaur.com ) from scratch. It is equipped with a 130 w CO2 laser. Amazing open source project. Unfortunately the guy that stays it abandoned the project, but there a ton of resources there
2. azazel75 Dec 5, 2023 parent

   The license kinda sucks though: ``` 3. USE RESTRICTIONS

   Licensee is expressly forbidden from:

   (a) Incorporating, modifying, or using the Software as part of any other product or service; ```

3. azazel75 Sep 13, 2019 parent

   "Before Ethernet was common, BNC coaxial cables were used on some NICs as well"

   Yes, at that time Ethernet was coaxial as well, the 10Base2

4. azazel75 May 8, 2019 parent

   So we live in a society that isn't able to find the resources to teach someone how to read and get free... Instead that people can buy an Android phone and become a slave of the technology... what a shame
5. 1 point Apr 19, 2018

   New version (0.9) of JavaScripthon Python3-to-ES6 compiler is available

   0 comments azazel75 gitlab.com
6. azazel75 Jun 2, 2017 parent

   That's like a Google tax, with the plus that you consciously agree to let it track you more than ever... wtf!
7. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016 parent

   I could assure you that even transcrypt cannot transpile Django.

   It does multiple inheritance with a polyfill and overally is much more "fatter" than JavaScripthon.

   But with JavaScripthon you can use any tool available in JS land to accomplish the same goal. Want to use Backbone's extend()? Use it.. want to use react's createClass() mixin?, the same

8. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016 parent

   It's in development, as many others software projects are, and is far from complete. The goal is to translate as much of core semantics as possible, but i doubt that all the core semantics will be translated. One for all is multi inheritance which is currently unsupported by current Javascript syntax. Even more, when you use an object such a list, it's really a JS Array that will be manipulated in the end, so you will have to use array.push() to add instead of python's list.append()

   But Translating something like Django is out of scope for all the transpilers, it would mean also converting sql drivers and so on? Does this really make any sense? Maybe you have a look at emscripten https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/wiki

9. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016 parent

   It cannot be used to convert python frameworks to javascript, nor Django nor any other
10. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016 parent

    Good :-)

    Do you have any link for this chrome detail about optimization?

    str(x) conversion is missing... i'll will implement it asap

11. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016 parent

    The main reason is... context switching, also i'm a big fan of python's standard library, but I have yet to do any complete work just with it.
12. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016 parent

    1) it renders import and from...import statements to equivalent ES6 imports. If you use something like Webpack down the pipeline you can already mix ES6 imports and CommonJS requires. Also, BabelJS by default transpiles ES6 imports to CommonJS requires.

    2) What do you mean exactly?

    3) There's no direct from-python loader, but the compilation can be splitted in two steps with the BabelJS Webpack loader used for the latter

13. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016 parent

    I'm a big fan of RapydScript, unfortunately it requires nodejs and I would prefer not have to.. but hey, there is a space for everybody ;-)
14. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016 parent

    It's implementable really and it is half-implemented, have a look at the call conventions... additional keyword arguments can be specified without any problem

    The problem is that there's no kwargs equivalent in js land.. and probably i don't want to wrap any call to make it possible.

15. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016 parent

    Yes, I drink it everyday
16. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016 parent

    Your post seems quite imprecise about Python's semantics...
17. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016 parent

    ops, sorry for that. Issues are enabled now ;-)
18. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016 parent

    For-of only works for iterable sources, it would not be a complete replacement of for...in, also it seems a bit slower that for...in as of now.. see https://kpdecker.github.io/six-speed/
19. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016 parent

    If jQuery is installed globally, without package management, just use:

    from __globals__ import jQuery

    ....

    jQuery('#an_id')...

20. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016 parent

    Javascripthon supports converting either a python source file or a python function object directly, but actually using the embedded js interpreter to do the transpilation takes some time due to BabelJS code bootstrap time.

    Having a "HOT" interpreter with an execution context that is persistent and can be used to convert code to ES5 on the fly has been already implemented by duckpy creator and i plan to intergate it very soon.

    See https://github.com/amol-/dukpy/issues/4

21. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016 parent

    Python lists are supported:

    * as literals;

    * in for loops;

    Keyword arguments accumulator has no corresponding feature in the ES6 world, as far as I know....

22. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016 parent

    Have a look at the example! ;-)
23. azazel75 Mar 31, 2016 parent

    The former, it translates Python 3.5 syntax and some of the core semantics to ES6+ JavaScript and then BabelJS is used to transpile that ES6 JS to ES5. All this retaining a sourcemap that maps back to the original Python sources.

    It does all without the need for nodejs (even if it can be used of course), it uses an embedded js interpreter.

24. 114 points Mar 31, 2016

    A Python-to-JavaScript Transpiler with BabelJS and SourceMaps

    62 comments azazel75 github.com
25. azazel75 Oct 17, 2015 parent

    > the ecosystem is still running 2.7. I cant wait to switch to Py3.

    Which one? Pyramid and SQLAlchemy work like a charm in Py3. Until you really name what your need is, that's just fud.

26. azazel75 Oct 17, 2015 parent

    We use ayncio and async/await coroutines of Python 3.5 on each of our packages.

    I hope that PyPy will have a Py3.5 compatible interpreter someday, but CPython is good enough for now.

This user hasn’t submitted anything.