- We do not have a freedom to movement _by motor vehicle_ in the US.
It is a privilege licensed by the State and regularly revoked through due process or expiry.
While your concern about mobility and privacy are valid, I would contend that public safety is what it’s to be weighed against. Some people really are better riders than drivers.
- I live in one of the areas they are actively testing/training in. Their cars consistently behave better and more safely than most human drivers that I’m forced to share the road with.
As semi-autonomous and autonomous cars become the norm, I would adore to see obtaining a drivers license ratchet up in difficulty in order to remove dangerous human drivers from the road.
- …I read the whole article at OP’s link, many comments off this thread…I even clicked into the college course material in https://www.hackerneue.com/item?id=44468452 …and not once did it occur to me why it was called “wet mode”…not once…
…until your comment. Here! Take my “lived through the 80’s and 90’s” card.
- I don’t think they missed a mark exactly. Perhaps they hesitated to shoot when others took the shot.
Marksmanship is about hitting the target, not firing first. I would not want a deeply embedded personal assistant that’s always on and learning from me only to get things wrong and frustrate me. Apple’s users are grandparents and newbies who will have even higher standards for Siri than experienced developers who might be more lenient.
- Internally, product leadership at the time had a quandary when it came to IPv6: there was lots of expressed demand for it due to IPv4 depletion looming and “World IPv6 Day/Launch” only about a year or two prior…
…but then, upon delivery, there was nothing. No customer appeared to adopt it even in its rudimentary form. Radio silence. The horsetrading of IPv4 addresses continued and we heard nothing about attempts at adoption for a very very long time.
It got filed away as a feature delivered to calm nerves about lacking that feature…not one that actually provided any forward value. How many other features did we ship that’s soul reason for existing was because lacking it caused discomfort, not because it genuinely helped?
- I would call markdown an “85% solution”. Not disparaging it at all by calling it that either.
The ease of use it brings is incredibly valuable and, if it gets you rapidly through 85% of what you need done (and leaves you in a good spot to take on the remaining 15%) then it’s the right tool to have used in that moment.
Off the shelf seasoning mixes are another great example. 85% of the solution (a tasty meal) in a bottle that leaves you to focus on the remaining 15% (cooking the rest of the meal)
- Something can be highly anticipated and utterly inconsequential at the same time. (See Star Wars Episode 1 as a primary example)
These assassinations were tragic and criminal and shocking at the time, but one has to be Gen X or older to have any emotional connection to them. To the rest of us, it’s just a chapter in our history books that’ll get a new paragraph or two appended now.
- At some point email went from a true communication avenue to just “sending this for reference”. Apps and services are adding their own notification inboxes and comment threads (or activity logs) and @-mentions as an interaction pattern so that they can enrich and embed communication in the context of what they do.
I won’t go so far as to say that email is dying, but it’s certainly changing in purpose.
- For perspective, 2055 is about as forward from us as these predictions are backward from us. Of all of the predictions about our future that exist now (AI/AGI/ASI, VR/AR, fusion, health and longevity, autonomous vehicles, human-computer blending, …the list goes on), which will seem naive, optimistic or pessimistic? I guess we’ll find out.
- I do find myself on the “private first” side…but also keep in mind that those who grab for pitchforks in defense of privacy aren’t a representative sample of the typical user either. (A purely statistical statement).
It’s very easy to confuse ‘loud protest from a small minority’ and the majority opinion. If a plurality of users chose to participate in an analytics program when asked and don’t care to protest phone-home activities when they’re discovered, then that’s where the majority opinion likely lies.
- I would caution us all not to interpret this as “obese people must be corrupt” (when it’s more a discussion of correlation not causation in either direction).
My kingdom for a dataset that included more countries than just the old soviet bloc. If this correlation holds true, it would rear its head no matter the geographical region.
It started out in the 1960’s meaning “humans with pointy ears and no emotions”, then in the 1980’s it was “squat humanoids with glowing fingers and a penchant for phoning home”, then in the 1990-2000 it was “infectious microbes that turn humans into zombies”. We pretty much all realized that the “life” part of “alien life” spans the entire breadth of what biology can produce. (The 2020’s even reduced it further to “RNA sequence which connects the entire human race except 13 folks into a vast hive mind”)
Widen the concept enough and lots more scientists will go “yeah something like thst that probably exists elsewhere, sure”