- Because we can and do sacrifice everything for car culture - starting with childhood.
- > They're probably using CG-NAT, though IP changes that often is a bit aggressive.
TMobile uses IPv4 addys in DOD's address space. They do change unexpectedly often.
And yeah. Being DOD IPs, they're cgnat'd behind tmobile's public ASN.
- I am not clear what your point is. The parent's point stands. A double colon only represents zeros (that were compressed and are not displayed).
Your link does not show different addresses from a valid compression, it shows different addresses from an invalid compression. The link examples what we don't do.
Conversely, if we compress the expanded addresses in your link, we will get 2 different compressed addresses.
- > especially as it seems everything is 2001::/16
I was sort of expecting that this week.
I had to transcribe a v6 addy for a WAN-WAN test (a few mi apart).
That's when I noticed that Charter (Spectrum) had issued
ref: https://bgp.he.net/AS33363#_prefixes62603:: for one WAN and 2602:: for the other WAN. - It could be 21.0/8
ref:https://old.reddit.com/r/tmobileisp/comments/1gg7361/why_is_...
I booted an LTE router using a T-Mobile SIM.
Within an hour I had changed WAN IP. Both were from AS749 US-DOD NIC
They were cgnat'd behind TMble's advertised asn.in 33.79.135.0/24 & 21.140.100.0/24. - > Every time I look at a [long] ipv6 address my brain goes “fack this”.
I do get that but I also get 'There are so many I could have all I wanted ... or I could if any of our fiber ISPs would support it, that is'
- > Network-related things are generally easy to .. type from memory [but] IPv6 is just too long
I was reminded of this 2d ago; I was testing one IPv6 WAN from another. DDNS had failed so I didn't have my usual crutch to lean on.
- > We need to fix this problem and provide great health care to all.
The group that isn't hostile toward helping the vulnerable, they didn't care at all about us once the ACA was there for them.
Take them off the table and there's literally no one left.
- Kratom and/or Kava are often worth trying. My brain chatter is happy and cheerful but those help tamper it down.
- Pretty much yes. I found only one promising statement in his 2016 runup - that he could buy politicians, essentially surfacing US's saturated levels of institutional bribery. ref:https://archive.fo/UdzO1
I thought it was the most honest statement I could remember from a politician. FF to now and the executive branch is/has been openly, loudly selling deep direct access to every possible inch of federal power. It's corruption without parallel.
So yeah. I can't think of one thing in 5 years of office. Maybe it's the ongoing massive campaigns of brutish cruelty that has my attention. Or maybe it's how some large % of the US population is increasingly turned on, the more unethical his behavior is. It's one of those or maybe it's one of the other endless competing calamities.
- Sameish. In May I paid $235 for G.Skill 96GB that is now $950. I actually bought the wrong kit and had to buy another.
It was too late for return so I upgraded my hyper-v server to a 13th gen i7.
- Stocks climbing in reaction to decisions that negatively impact the public - this is a theme I see a lot.
- > How come temp agencies would only send someone out on one job?
There was a clique of employees who were tight with management and got recurring work. This wouldn't have been a problem if the temp agency stopped advertising open jobs when their docket was over-full.
- I was an employment counselor in the late 1990s. Even then, ½ to ¾ of realistic, worthwhile jobs were phantoms.
FF to now and hiring portals silently drop viable applicants for a long list of never disclosed reasons. I know temp agencies that hire, send the employee out on 1 job then never again.
I've never know a time when hiring wasn't crap for entire classes of viable applicants.
- >> Why isn't this company sued for computer fraud and abuse?
> Because using the CFAA as a cudgel against things you don't like, whether it's journalists exposing insecure government systems, or companies engaging in deceptive marketing practices is a bad idea?
I think you're confusing bad ethics with a bad idea. A prosecutor's job is to win, not behave ethically.
- I'm one of the millions of Americans in the other group. If I get a treatable, life threatening disorder, I die.
We don't get a lot of press. During the first decade of the ACA we didn't exist for anyone reporting on the US healthcare system.
But our visibility has improved and some days we're almost noticed for moments at a time.
- I did different searches and am getting some more results than I used to.
This hash search gives one site: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%229623748B411A3CD02DE8F332820C4C7...
This way also gives one torrent site: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=all+quiet+on+the+western+front+193...
- > I feel like ddg doesnt really censor the ability to find the website by just searchign 1337x
For us users, the point of search engines is to index the context of sites and tell us which one(s) have the info we're looking for.
There isn't much point to a search engine that just tells us where a site is. Even less to tell us for a site we already know.
- Context is confusing because we arrive in the middle of a story arc, at a point where an unrelated tech snafu happens.
The story arc is about a lost airtag that is living it's secret life in Mexico.
The link is for a post where Apple decides the distance to it's location in Mexico is greater than the circumference of the Earth.
For some minutes during a few months, in a minuscule % of a massive number parking lots.
It doesn't feel like an in-kind replacement for what we've lost.