Vanit
Joined 791 karma
- Vanit parentUgh a terminal purist. Just as insufferable as the ones in person at work. Yeah have fun with your gigantic unorganized git diffs I guess.
- I read some of your other replies and I can't quite get a read on your line of reasoning.
The issue is we would give less attention to these things if it wasn't for the social credit the humans gave the vomit. So we engage in good faith and it turns out it was effectively a prank, and we have no choice but to value requests from those people less now because it was clear they didn't care about our response.
- I don't understand the use case, can someone enlighten me? I've always used them as a caching mechanism for derived / expensive data, and they work perfectly for that as-is. If you want to enumerate them I can't help but think your mental model is wrong and you actually don't want the keys to ever be released from memory.
- It's not apparent if you're not already an expert in the domain you're querying, so users trust its answers, especially because it's delivered with an air of confidence (until you challenge it).
Unfortunately that's good enough for a lot of people, especially when you don't actually care and just need an output to give to someone else (office jobs etc).
- Not at l surprised by this. I conducted a similar experiment when I was trying to get it to generate a body for a "Nigerian prince" email. It outright refused at first, but it was perfectly happy when I just told it that I, Prince Abubu, just wanted to send a message to all my friends about the money I needed to reclaim my throne.
- I used to work for a company that made an app for drafting evacuation signs, and we had a usecase for using a map as an underlay to show the surrounding buildings/terrain for the siteplan. I recall that quite a few map providers had a TOS that prevented that usecase (as the evac signs would be saved to pdf for distribution or printed), so I'm interested what the take is here.