- This dude is attempting to gaslight the entire world.
- Just a hint?
- “What's the biggest brand in the world? If you said Trump, you're not wrong.”
3*:
- “What's the biggest brand in the world? If you said Trump, you're not wrong.”
3 *:
- Not related to the text itself, but the LLM style more generally: why does it regularly adopt the “it’s not X, it is Y” pattern?
- Not exactly.
What he did is he drew a simple sketch (a drawing of a bird) in an audio spectrogram, played the resulting sound to a (very talented) bird, which replayed the sound to him, and the spectrogram of the bird sound really looked quite similar to the original sketch.
While super interesting, not quite storing data in a bird in a way I hoped when reading the title.
- Why do I need to subscribe to read the article?
- Daily notes are my life line.
If you’re managing any fairly complex organisation and handling multiple threads on variable time horizons, daily notes can be an immensely useful tool.
- This reminded me reading (ages ago) about Altera’s HardCopy [1]: a “process that takes a working FPGA design implemented in one of Altera’s high-end FPGAs (such as Stratix II) and gives you a functionally- and footprint-equivalent ASIC at a fraction of the unit cost.”
Did a bit of Googling and realised it seems to be still alive in the form of Intel’s eASIC! [2].
[1] https://www.eejournal.com/article/20081125_hardcopy/
[2] https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/details/eas...
- Grok is the Tesla of AI: poor quality and desperately unreliable hype fuel.
- That logo reminds me of Zastava Yugo.
- How come there’s no visible craters?
- Trust pilot is a scam. I knew that they protect you from negative reviews if you pay, but I didn’t know they would extort you if you don’t.
A new low.
- Bonus: the useful idiots also caused damage and harm to the USA.
- It figures. Grifters all.
- Yeah, turns out running the largest economy on the planet is even more complicated than setting the clock on a VCR. Who would have thought. At least they tried.
- Perhaps we should entertain the simplest explanation: the administration is utterly out of its depth.
Incompetent leader and a coterie of overconfident personalities with no depth or expertise. The fallout is predictable.
- Wow. Who would have thought that international trade policy written in crayon could go this wrong. Shocked.
- The grotesque irony of this situation is that the Democrats aren’t even able to put up a fight for democracy.
- Next step: figure a safe way to stimulate drainage mechanisms…
- Sounds like something that aims to to unlock the ability to use the military to go after the cartels on Mexican territory.
- Vibe-based science policy.
- Quite impressive, esp. considering this was 1980’s tech. Presumably, today it should be much more advanced.
- Regrowing a new America may take a while. And who knows what will grow out of the ashes of the one being slashed and burned.
Given the betrayal of former allies, unprovoked trade war on nearest neighbours and most loyal partners, and a complete lack of any demonstrable moral values or principles, I’m afraid to think what monstrosity may arise out of that pile of ashes.
- Feel free to FAFO, but the twist is: you’re gambling with your children’s lives. Good luck!
- Elon is making sure his enterprises have no competition for federal funds.
- What is terrifying is that your comment actually makes a great deal of sense. In 21st century America. World’s oldest democracy, and a former beacon of light of the Free World.
One thing comes to mind: this is not a kind of a conversation two human beings could have had. This is a genuinely LLM-to-LLM interaction, articulated in human terms.
I wonder about the “feelings” they refer to (or whatever is the term they used). What is the underlying phenomenology they chose to articulate as such?