3
points
SkyLinx
Joined 342 karma
- 1 point
- 2 points
- 4 points
- SkyLinxAwesome, will join :)
- Ah, it asks me for a license saying that my trial expired on in January, when I tried it. Is there any way I can try it again to see what's changed?
- If its similar to k9s and lens what sets it apart? Please don’t get upset from my questions, it’s not my intention. I am genuinely just wondering why I would pay for this tool when there are similar tools that are free to use. I actually tried your tool not long ago - I remembered now from the screenshot. At the time it didn’t support proxies if I remember correctly and I didn’t really see anything that would make me switch from k9s (my current favorite because I’m very fast using it with the keyboard). Perhaps I will try it again to see what’s changed.
- I’m probably not going to try it because while it sounds interesting it seems expensive for me considering that there are free tools already available. How does this compare to Rancher for example?
- 3 points
- 1 point
- With Drill I get the same numbers with or without the -t argument for tcp. So it gives a different result from dig. Why?
- Wow now I am even more confused. The Time column shows 3.67 for UDP and 7.32 for TCP. This seems to suggest that UDP is faster, but dig commands show the opposite. Why is that?
- On Mac?
- That's why I think it may be a problem on Macs, because I don't see the same issue on Linux either. I am not familiar with Wireshark. What should I be looking for? I tried but there's a lot of information for each packet.