PavleMiha
Joined 185 karma
- PavleMiha parentDid you read Trump's post about the mission calling the previous administration incompetents? That predates Berger's post?
- But Crew 10 had also been planned for a while, so the narrative that Trump ordered a new ship to go up "NOW" can't be true. For example, heres a post about NASA moving the launch date to March, in December last year: https://www.nasa.gov/blogs/commercialcrew/2024/12/17/nasa-ad...
- 11 points
- Speculating, but Apple wanted to make sure that the only people photographed using the headset were models and actors who are very attractive. That way whenever a news outlet runs a story about it, they have to use the picture of the attractive/cool people using it, and people make an association that the headset makes people attractive/cool.
- And now they’re down to 2,300 according to Musk. Those are huge layoffs, even if we take pre pandemic staffing numbers as a baseline.
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1616706530841333761?s=46...
- Unless you have some information I don’t, Twitter is way below its pre-pandemic staffing levels. Obviously hard to tell exactly how low they went as they’re not public anymore, but this is quite different from Meta and such that really did just go back to pre-pandemic level. CNBC say Twitter is at 1300 people, a drop of 80%. It’s mind boggling.
- Here’s almond milk referenced in a recipe in 1410:
“For to make blomanger. Nym rys & lese hem & washe hem clene, & do þereto god almande mylke & seþ hem tyl þey al tobrest; & þan lat hem kele.”
People have used the word milk to refer to some plant products for too long for this to confuse people now.
- 3 points
- 3 points
- There are other potential explanations for your observation[1]. Do you think you could be subject to confirmation bias?
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/x2jj3s/obi...
- 9 points
- Carbon offsets are super complicated, potentially shady, and I don’t fully understand them, but the gist of it is that they pay money to companies to either not produce carbon that they otherwise would have, or use the money to install and operate equipment in factories and powerplants that captures carbon before it goes out into the world. You can also do things that pull carbon out of regular air but I think the first two options are so much more efficient that they dominate the market. It seems like the system could be gamed, but as far as I know it broadly works.
- 1 point
- My problem with this is that we have little proof that people are any good at this sort of task (i.e. monitoring something without intervening for really long stretches of time).
So if data show that people keep failing at it we have to take a look and decide that it's not a good system, not that the people are at fault.