- 63stackThe same response (you are using model X instead of Y) have been perpetuated since 2024, and will still be perpetuated in 2026.
- >For verbose, straightforward code with clear cut test scenarios, one agent can easily 24/7 the work of 20 FT engineers
I have been working professionally for ~16 years in software development, and scenarios like this was about 5% of my work.
- Klarna functions as a payment provider as well, not just a payday loan service (which you are implying I assume). This comment says more about you.
- Amazon, Google and Microsoft are balls deep invested in AI, a rational person should draw 0 conclusions in them showcasing how productive they are with it.
I'd say it's more about the fear of their $50billion+ investments not paying off is creeping up on them.
- Maybe he's already ahead of you by not using current models, 2026 models are going to make 2025 models completely obsolete, wasting time on them is dumb.
- > there are dozens of little scripts or helper functions that accelerate my work. However I usually don’t write them because I don’t have the time
People who write things like this can't expect to be taken seriously.
Before AI you didn't have time to write things that saved you time? So you just ended up spending (wasting) more time by going the long way? That was a better choice than just doing the thing that would have saved you time?
- I think it's reasonable to doubt this, and/or wonder how long until they decide to change this, and/or make exceptions like "to make your search experience better, Gemini now indexes your metadata (but only metadata so that's okay)"
- This reads like shilling/advertisement.. Coding AIs are struggling for anything remotely complex, make up crap and present it as research, write tests that are just "return true", and won't ever question a decision you make.
Those twenty engineers must not have produced much.
- The blessing the plebs with eternal wisdom comment.
Take a look at GPU prices and how that "supply increased thus bringing the prices down"
- You can put them behind wireguard and still have all this without exposing it
- I'm also going to leave my personal opinion;
You don't need ECC
You absolutely don't need proxmox, containers are good enough
It does not quickly make sense to build a proper home server
Raid1 or raid6 makes sense, but it's absolutely not a tipping point.
- I'm so fascinated by replies like this, it's too random and nonsensical to be a language barrier issue, but it also does not pattern match into LLM generated text. Reminds me of ~2010 era wordpress comment spam.
- >So instead of speaking from the high ground, please, tell us what your solution about mass disinformation happening from US social media megacorps, Russia mass disinformation, mass recruitment of people for sabotage on critical infrastructure.
Why is the onus of explaining this on the people opposing it? Did any of the proposing politicians ever explain how their plan is going to solve any of these, rather than just being a massive power grab packaged up in "think about the children"? There are plenty of explanations on why this is not going to stop crime, why do you want more explanations and solutions from people telling you this is not going to work, rather than asking the people proposing "how is this going to work"?
- The value is being able to mislead your users
- Yes. The whole "you will be ddosd if you are exposed to the world wide web" is fud. (And/or racketeering)
- Just skip the whole encryption/decryption shebang then.
But no, this does not work, scrapers are using residential ips, and they have enough that they can rotate between them if they get blocked.
- You can be productive in htmx after spending less than an hour reading the docs, even though there are (I assume) zero jobs asking for it
- This is amazing, I was just wondering about if it's possible to tie anubis together with iocaine, but it seems you already thought of that.
- Yes
- and your point is ...?