Preferences

I'm not sure how badly I want to find out just how unlimited "unlimited texting" is, especially at 0 extra cost a month. Of course it's included in the price somewhere, but I can't turn it off to pay less. Suddenly receiving thousands of text messages a minute after hardly using sms for years doesn't sound like a great idea...

Calling my number and using the good old dial-up method sounds much more efficient actually. Isn't the bitrate around 128kbps in normal calls?


klodolph
In most parts of the world, POTS is 64 kbit/s, over which you can reliably run a 56 kbit/s modem. Cell phone audio uses less bandwidth, but I can imagine that you could get 8 kbit/s or more reliably, compared to the SMS data rate (7 bits/char * 160 chars/msg * 3 msg/sec = 3.4 kbit/s).
vidarh
GSM data used to be 9600 bps back in the day when you'd connect a separate GSM modem. A full data rate raw GSM channel is less than 13kbps, and you'll lose some to signalling.
jrochkind1
I think you have a point, but note:

> The phone recieves this stream at a rate of 3 messages per second

So note that's 180 text messages a minute maximum throughput, not thousands.

I think you raise an interesting question of if it might be faster to implement a software modem over your voice connection, but I also have no idea if that's actually feasible or not.

(will various kinds of digital audio compression or filtering get in the way? I dunno. Can android apps easily get access to the voice audio stream in the way they'd need? I dunno.) (it'd certainly be a lot harder than letting the SMS network take care of the transmission layer, at any rate). (But yeah, if internet over SMS is a cool hack, then internet over software modem over audio would be even cooler!)

Wintamute
In the mid 1980s I used to load computer games onto my ZX Spectrum using analogue tapes and an old hifi. 1535 bit/s :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZX_Spectrum_software#Tape

This item has no comments currently.