Preferences

They're using Twilio. Each SMS they send costs them $0.0075.

However, simply stripping the junk out of web pages for mobile delivery has real promise. Just put all third-party content on "load on user request only", like mail attachments.


AndrewKemendo
Wow, that gets expensive very quickly especially at 3 messages/sec.

Assuming the average user gets only one burst of three messages per query, uses it only twice a day for 200 days a year and the service gets only 10,000 users signed up, the costs just to send the texts for the next year alone would be $90,000.

Seems like it will be hard to scale but I agree that this is a really cool way to get connectivity! Best of luck.

yebyen
I don't know, next to paying $35/mo for a cheapo cell with unlimited texts and a USB gateway to SMS, you're saying that for moderate users they would need to pay about $9/year to get their internet access on top of that.

Seems reasonable to think that you might pay $5-9/mo on a budget for a limited access to internet such as this; now it sounds like potentially economically viable to even have an employee or two after paying for all the texts.

AndrewKemendo
Right, it might be worth it for a certain market at these prices, especially if internet service/smartphones aren't available.

If they can just get those SMS costs down it would be much easier to scale.

anubiann00b
You're welcome.

That would be pretty cool for a normal web browser too.

EDIT: I'm also part of the team, that comment looks really strange out of context.

We don't have specific monetization plans yet, but we're probably going to do some sort of donation system, or maybe ads (through wifi). No idea though, it is pretty expensive.

whoa, so this isn't just a proof of concept?
njovin
The price goes down with volume. They should also look at alternative providers. Nexmo and Plivo both offer free inbound SMS and have APIs similar to Twilio's.
SMS costs nothing to the provider. Not nothing as in almost nothing. Nothing as in 0.00USD per SMS. They are sent in unused fields of control packets.
pilsetnieks
To the operator, not the provider, Twilio in this case. Twilio doesn't send them for free. Operators charge for access to them and you have to pay, if you want to send SMS.

They also aren't entirely free to the operators themselves - once you start counting them and charging for them, there are administrative costs; then there are costs related to interconnections with other operators, and costs related to maintaining their own SMSCs (SMS centers). The only thing in this whole mechanism that the operator gets for free (actually not free since they have to pay for the network and base stations) is the delivery channel which is not insignificant but it is also just one part of many.

stevejalim
Wow. I knew it was cheap - that makes sense in light of what you're saying. Though there is a minor sting: "mobile networks charge each other interconnect fees of at least US$0.04 when connecting between different phone networks" [1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_Message_Service

Stripping down webpages for mobile is an old idea -- google used to do it by default when you clicked a link from the search page on your phone.
pbhjpbhj
Opera and Opera Mobile had (have?) it as an option too. It was pretty effective and included resizing and re-encoding/compressing JPEGs IIRC.
bluedino
BlackBerry based a big part of their business on doing so.

This item has no comments currently.