Preferences

We are testing [0] our Sparc v8 compiler backend. Apparently, a 3GHz i7 core emulating Sparc is significantly faster than an FPGA synthesized Sparc.

[0] http://pp.info.uni-karlsruhe.de/git/firm-testsuite/


Schedule change. Today's project is to see is qemu running a big endian PPC delivers acceptable performance for testing software in a bigendian environment. I could retire an old Mac Mini PPC running Debian.
justincormack
Good idea might try that too...
dorianj
What kind of FPGA package were you previously using?

Many FPGA CPU simulators attempt to be cycle-accurate for the purpose of architecture development, where the emulator has the leeway of treating instructions as atomic units and abstracting the rest.

qznc OP
Would have to ask my colleague about the details, but yes it is cycle-accurate. It is running 50 or 80 MHz, so it is expected to run slower.

This item has no comments currently.