To GP: not all of us who automate go for low hanging fruit, I guess.
To the peer calling this illegitimate [or anyone, really]: without the assistance of an LLM, please break down the foul nature of... let me check my notes, gainful employment.
Yes, even if they don't say it. The other objections largely come from the need to sound more legitimate.
> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.
At the moment, it's just for taking money from gullible investors.
Its eating into business letters, essays and indie art generation but programming is a really tough cookie to crack.
It's like how "burger flippers" didn't go extinct due to automation. The burger joint simply mechanised and automated the parts that made sense, and now a lunch shift is handled by 5 employees instead of 20.
They will not replace the calibre of folks like Rob Pike in quite some time, perhaps (and I'd bet on) never.
I will grant you that the hype does not live up to the reality. The vast majority of jobs being taken from US developers are simply being offshored with AI as an excuse - but it is an actual real phenomenon I've personally witnessed.
That certainly in the short term took some programmers jobs away. That doesn't mean it pans out in the long term.