Obviously, C# is one of Microsoft's flagship language along with TypeScript.
So it's expected to be frequently mentioned there.
Sure, and Rust is the most used language for modern TS/JS tooling, outside of TS/JS. There would have been substantial ecosystem benefits had Rust been chosen.
Do you have a source for that?
Because esbuild is Go. tac was TypeScript and will be Go. Bun is Zig.
Come to think of it. I don't use a single Rust tool for the web. node is c++. deno breaks too much.
So, do you have a source for your claim?
Transpilers: SWC, Oxc
Linters/Formatters: DPrint, deno lint, Biome, Oxlint, Oxfmt
Bundlers: Rolldown (replacing esbuild in Vite), Rspack, Turbopack, and certain components of Parcel
All built with Rust
Rust can do complex graph processing, as well as efficient easy memory management, but it's going to do it in a different structure than a GCed lang would. Hence my statement that 1 to 1 translation was the primary factor.
> CTRL+F "rust" on the Go issue and see how many results you get.
Yes and so what? There's 35 for .NET or 74 for C#, yet you don't see people claiming the C# cult was harassing the TS team.