Preferences

Another red-flag to me is the diagram labeling "proprietary superalloys". This implies more than one new metal composition, which by definition is unproven? So a new metal, in a new engine, in a new airplane.

It's exactly what existing manufacturers are doing. What they're calling "legacy".

Here, watch this which goes into detail on existing superalloy tech used in todays engines: https://youtu.be/QtxVdC7pBQM?si=coIv6w0N2BZ4EOTK&t=1027 and

And here's how single crystal blades are already being used in today's engines: https://youtu.be/QtxVdC7pBQM?si=XpnAgVH1QmLiX0g0&t=1650

Add to that the "titanium" lable. Nothing is pure titanium. It is all alloys, most of which are "proprietary". Inconsistant technical terminology within a diagram is a huge red flag imho.

>> Legacy turbines need huge quantities of water for cooling to avoid thermal derate in hot environments

Yup. Turbine-powered helicopters famously haul big tanks of water around when flying in hot environments. Heat is a problem, not a game changer.

This item has no comments currently.

Keyboard Shortcuts

Story Lists

j
Next story
k
Previous story
Shift+j
Last story
Shift+k
First story
o Enter
Go to story URL
c
Go to comments
u
Go to author

Navigation

Shift+t
Go to top stories
Shift+n
Go to new stories
Shift+b
Go to best stories
Shift+a
Go to Ask HN
Shift+s
Go to Show HN

Miscellaneous

?
Show this modal