>A pity. Saw Zig as something rising but with this kind of toxicity, no thanks.
Don't get me wrong, it is a bit toxic. However, I feel like taking one comment in a larger article and blowing it up out of proportion is just as toxic.
> blowing it up out of proportion is just as toxic
One person decided that something wasn't for them. How is that in the same league as someone in a leadership position being unprofessional?
I personally don't care too much for hierarchies, so I didn't factor this in. You can be toxic at any level.
> You can be toxic at any level
And yet the context is extremely important.
> I didn't factor this in
That's how you get to false equivalencies.
>That's how you get to false equivalencies.
No, you're just putting something into it which doesn't matter to me. Not a false equivalency.
You said:
> blowing it up out of proportion is just as toxic
Making a false equivalency of the supposed toxicity of the commenter's post and the toxicity displayed in the article.
You can just take the L; you don't have to be performatively obtuse about it.
It's probably a lapse, don't read into it too much. You can't expect people to tip toe around. Just give him feedback.
A pity. Saw Zig as something rising but with this kind of toxicity, no thanks.