But if you're in the same boat, at least use something that has an adblocker, like Brave, Vivaldi or Opera.
I have a redirect rule that redirects https://www.youtube.com/shorts/<video-id> to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=<video-id>
Given the success of TikTok, the answer is apparently, "billions of people", but I just don't get it.
Wrong question.
The right question is: "Do we blindly copy Instagram?"
Without autoplay there is no engagement once the video is over. With autoplay there is the risk someone leaves the player on the background and ignores it. With looping videos people get annoyed and (if they’re like me) close the tab or skip to the next video just to get something different
I complain about it to Google. They ignore it. They couldn't possibly give a shit.
I should probably complain to my congressman. Who also won't do shit even if they actually give a shit.
There's a long history of people not using it. Most people today don't use it.
Shorts as a whole are incredibly addictive and have a much lower benefit to drawback ratio. Parents should be able to make this cost/benefit decision for their kids. I wish I could turn them off for myself. I settled on only using YouTube on my laptop because shorts don’t have the same appeal in that context.
Worth a try.
Settings -> media -> "Block YouTube Shorts".
There are also other settings related to YouTube. Brave is the only thing I'd use for YouTube on mobile.
There should absolutely be a better answer here.
Youtube Shorts? Crickets.
It's IMPOSSIBLE to disable it with parental controls and it has the exact same slop as the other vertical video services.
Which kinda sucks because I'm fine with my kids watching horizontal youtube videos by certain creators, but I'd rather not they have access to the infinite pool of shorts unfiltered.
In the Android app it's literally just one line, which I have to scroll down to... like two pages.
The number of times I clicked “show less” and it has zero effect on the number of shorts.